Since I had some initial problems distinguishing between the proposal-accepts and the assertion-acknowledges, I thought I should write down my final conclusions. The only assertion carried out until the final make plans was to send the ambulance straight off to marketplace. This is known because it is the only action referred to as already having taken place in the make plan. Resegmentation: All of this gets a little complicated because I sometimes I would resegment things later in the dialog first, so the numbers may be a bit off: Since utt24 of the original overlapped the very beginning of utt23, I resegmented and switched them so that utt23 could be an acknowledgement of the assertion in utt22 I combined utt45, utt46, and utt47 to make one long utterance so that it would better relate all together to utt48. Based also on an exact overlap, I took the original utt51 and put the "yeah" in utt53 so it would be a response I combined utt87 and utt88 to make one utterance for an acknowledgement of the assertion of utt86 I took the original utt107, cut off the end "highland park" and made it utt108, while I took the original utt108 and, despite the different speaker, put it on the end of 107 (except that these were moved up by one due to a previous combination of utterances. That way "highland park" could be a summary and the "correct" could be an acknowledgement of this summary With the original utt 55, I broke it into two segments so the original utts 56 and 57 could be a response (put together)to that and utts 58 and 59 could be responses to the second half (also put together). With the original utts 138 and 139, I put them together. I made the original utts 128 and 129 one utterance because they seemed like they went together and were more coherent than seperately I stopped because my structure matched the experimental structure