[〈det government.n〉 have.v 〈det decision.n〉]
In Wikipedia:
When the crown prince and regent of Denmark, the future Frederick VI married Charles’s eldest daughter Marie Sophie, he made several unsuccessful attempts at substantially influencing decisions of the government and the regent.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB When))
(S (NP (NP (DT the) (NX (NX (NN crown) (NN prince)) (CC and) (NX (NN regent))))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (NNP Denmark)) (, ,)
(NP (DT the) (JJ future) (NNP Frederick) (NNP VI)))))
(VP (VBD married)
(NP (NP (NNP Charles) (POS 's)) (JJS eldest) (NN daughter))
(NP (NNP Marie) (NNP Sophie)))))
(, ,)
(NP (PRP he))
(VP (VBD made)
(NP (JJ several) (JJ unsuccessful) (NNS attempts))
(PP (IN at)
(S (VP (ADVP (RB substantially)) (VBG influencing)
(NP (NP (NNS decisions))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN government)) (CC and)
(NP (DT the) (NN regent)))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
By a decision of the Flemish Government of March 31, 2006, the agency began operation on April 1, 2006.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (PP (IN By)
(NP (NP (DT a) (NN decision))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (JJ Flemish) (NN Government)))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (NNP March) (CD 31)) (, ,)
(NP (CD 2006)))
(, ,)
(NP (DT the) (NN agency))
(VP (VBD began)
(NP (NN operation))
(PP (IN on)
(NP (NNP April) (CD 1) (, ,) (CD 2006))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
But what floored me was the government’s decision to loan $ 85 billion to A – I – G so they would not further disrupt our fragile economy.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (CC But)
(SBAR (WHNP (WP what))
(S (VP (VBD floored)
(NP (PRP me)))))
(VP (AUX was)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN government) (POS 's)) (NN decision)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB loan)
(NP (QP ($ $) (CD 85) (CD billion)))
(PP (TO to)
(NP (DT A) (PRN (: -)
(NP (PRP I)) (: -)) (NNP G)))
(SBAR (IN so)
(S (NP (PRP they))
(VP (MD would) (RB not)
(VP (ADVP (RB further)) (VB disrupt)
(NP (PRP$ our) (JJ fragile) (NN economy)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Prime Minister Helen Clark’s comparison of hypothetical body counts between a Labour and National Government’s decision to deploy troops to Iraq represents an all – time low in politics, and in the personal standards of her worn – out and bitter remnant of a Party once proud to stand for ordinary decent Kiwis, ACT National Security
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NP (NP (JJ Prime) (NNP Minister) (NNP Helen) (NNP Clark) (POS 's)) (NN comparison))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (JJ hypothetical) (NN body) (NNS counts))
(PP (IN between)
(NP (NP (DT a) (NNP Labour) (CC and) (NNP National) (NN Government) (POS 's)) (NN decision)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB deploy)
(NP (NNS troops))
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NNP Iraq)))))
(VP (VBZ represents)
(NP (NP (DT an)
(ADJP (ADJP (NP (DT all) (: -) (NN time)) (JJ low)
(PP (PP (IN in)
(NP (NNS politics)))
(, ,) (CC and)
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (DT the) (JJ personal) (NNS standards))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (PRP$ her) (JJ worn))))
(: -)
(ADJP (JJ out) (CC and) (JJ bitter)))
(NN remnant))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (DT a) (NN Party))
(ADJP (RB once) (JJ proud))))
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VP (VB stand)
(PP (IN for)
(NP (JJ ordinary) (JJ decent) (NNS Kiwis))))
(, ,)
(VP (VB ACT)
(NP (NNP National) (NNP Security))))))))))
In Wikipedia:
Following a decision of the Thai government on May 15 2007, all of the 81 minor districts were to be upgraded to full districts.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (PP (VBG Following)
(NP (NP (NP (DT a) (NN decision))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NNP Thai) (NN government)))
(PP (IN on)
(NP (NNP May) (CD 15))))
(NP (CD 2007))))
(, ,)
(NP (NP (DT all))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (CD 81) (JJ minor) (NNS districts))))
(VP (AUX were)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (AUX be)
(VP (VBN upgraded)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (JJ full) (NNS districts)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
“If a security deal is not signed? by Dec. 31, regarding the recent U.S. – Russia row over Georgia and the Iraqi government’s decision not to extend the U.S. forces’ presence in Iraq for another year, the U.S. presence in Iraq will come across with difficulty in terms of the law,’ ’ he said.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (POS ') (: ')
(SBAR (IN If)
(S (NP (DT a) (NN security) (NN deal))
(VP (AUX is) (RB not)
(VP (VBN signed)))))
(. ?))
(PP (IN by)
(NP (NNP Dec) (. .) (CD 31)))
(, ,)
(VP (VBG regarding)
(NP (DT the) (JJ recent) (NNP U.S.)))
(: -)
(S (S (NP (NNP Russia))
(VP (VB row)
(PP (IN over)
(NP (NNP Georgia)))))
(CC and)
(S (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ Iraqi) (NN government) (POS 's)) (NN decision)
(S (RB not)
(VP (TO to)
(VP (VB extend)
(NP (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP U.S.) (NNS forces) (POS ')) (NN presence))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NNP Iraq))))
(PP (IN for)
(NP (DT another) (NN year)))
(, ,)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NNP U.S.) (NN presence))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NNP Iraq)))))
(VP (MD will)
(VP (VB come) (PRT (RP across))
(PP (IN with)
(NP (NP (NN difficulty))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (NNS terms))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN law))))
(PRN (, ,) ('' ') ('' ')
(S (NP (PRP he))
(VP (VBD said)))))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
As a result, many Jewish leaders around the world who held to a policy of not publicly challenging decisions of Israel’s government, have chosen to coalesce around the position: opposing Israeli negotiations which include any discussion of ceding sovereignty over part or all of Jerusalem.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (PP (IN As)
(NP (DT a) (NN result)))
(, ,)
(NP (NP (JJ many) (JJ Jewish) (NNS leaders))
(PP (IN around)
(NP (DT the) (NN world)))
(SBAR (WHNP (WP who))
(S (VP (VBD held)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NP (DT a) (NN policy))
(PP (IN of)
(S (RB not)
(VP (ADVP (RB publicly)) (VBG challenging)
(NP (NP (NNS decisions))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (NNP Israel) (POS 's)) (NN government)))
(, ,))
(VP (AUX have)
(VP (VBN chosen)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB coalesce) (PRT (RP around))
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN position)) (: :)
(S (VP (VBG opposing)
(NP (NP (NNP Israeli) (NNS negotiations))
(SBAR (WHNP (WDT which))
(S (VP (VBP include)
(NP (NP (DT any) (NN discussion))
(PP (IN of)
(S (VP (VBG ceding)
(NP (NN sovereignty))
(PP (IN over)
(NP (NP (NN part) (CC or) (DT all))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NNP Jerusalem)))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
Serbia was thus with 4 out of 8 presidency votes able to heavily influence decisions of the federal government.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NNP Serbia))
(VP (AUX was) (ADVP (RB thus)
(PP (IN with)
(NP (NP (CD 4) (NN out))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (QP (CD 8) (NN presidency)) (NNS votes)))
(ADJP (JJ able)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (ADVP (RB heavily)) (VB influence)
(NP (NP (NNS decisions))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (JJ federal) (NN government)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Prime – Minister Gordon Brown was enjoying his vacation in the area, and the locals decided to take this opportunity to draw his attention to the recent decision of the Government to stop funding the coastal protection measures, which effectively means that over time large spaces of land next to the village would be taken over by th sea, and even perhaps some of the cottages would be flooded.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (NP (NNP Prime) (: -) (NNP Minister) (NNP Gordon) (NNP Brown))
(VP (AUX was)
(VP (VBG enjoying)
(NP (PRP$ his) (NN vacation))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (DT the) (NN area)))
(, ,) (CC and)
(S (NP (DT the) (NNS locals))
(VP (VBD decided)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB take)
(NP (DT this) (NN opportunity)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB draw)
(NP (PRP$ his) (NN attention))
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NP (DT the) (JJ recent) (NN decision))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN Government)))
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB stop)
(S (VP (VBG funding)
(NP (NP (DT the) (JJ coastal) (NN protection) (NNS measures)) (, ,)
(SBAR (WHNP (WDT which))
(S (ADVP (RB effectively))
(VP (VBZ means)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (S (PP (IN over)
(NP (NN time)))
(NP (NP (JJ large) (NNS spaces))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (NN land)) (ADVP (JJ next)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (DT the) (NN village))))
(VP (MD would)
(VP (AUX be)
(VP (VBN taken) (PRT (RP over))
(PP (IN by)
(NP (CD th) (NN sea))))
(, ,) (CC and)
(S (ADVP (RB even) (RB perhaps))
(NP (NP (DT some))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NNS cottages))))
(VP (MD would)
(VP (VB be)
(VP (VBN flooded)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
McCain, Obama and the politics of bailouts The government’s decision not to bail out Lehman Brothers, and to let the firm die a public death, is a legitimate campaign issue today: Should the federal government be saving Wall Street firms, or should it let them fend for themselves?
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (NP (NP (NNP McCain)) (, ,)
(NP (NP (NNP Obama)) (CC and)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NNS politics))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NNS bailouts)
(S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN government) (POS 's)) (NN decision)) (RB not)
(VP (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB bail) (PRT (RP out))
(NP (NNP Lehman) (NNPS Brothers))))
(, ,) (CC and)
(VP (TO to)
(VP (VB let)
(S (NP (DT the) (NN firm))
(VP (VB die)
(NP (DT a) (JJ public) (NN death)))
(, ,))
(VP (AUX is)
(NP (DT a) (JJ legitimate) (NN campaign) (NN issue) (NN today))))
(: :) (SQ (SQ (MD Should)
(NP (DT the) (JJ federal) (NN government))
(VP (AUX be)
(VP (VBG saving)
(NP (NNP Wall) (NNP Street) (NNS firms)))))
(, ,) (CC or) (SQ (MD should)
(NP (PRP it))
(VP (VB let)
(S (NP (PRP them))
(VP (VB fend)
(PP (IN for)
(NP (PRP themselves))))
(. ?))))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
(AP) – State officials say they’re not pleased with a federal court’s ruling overturning the government’s decision to…
(Parse)
(S1 (FRAG (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-)
(NP (NNP AP)) (-RRB- -RRB-)) (: -)
(S (NP (NNP State) (NNS officials))
(VP (VBP say)
(SBAR (S (NP (PRP they))
(VP (AUX 're)
(ADJP (RB not) (JJ pleased)
(PP (IN with)
(NP (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ federal) (NN court) (POS 's)) (NN ruling))
(VP (VBG overturning)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN government) (POS 's)) (NN decision))
(PP (TO to)
(NP (CD ..)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
’s review to comment on the government’s recent decision to give the authority the right to deny services to developmentally disabled adults with IQs over 70.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (PRP 's))
(VP (VB review)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB comment)
(PP (IN on)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN government) (POS 's)) (JJ recent) (NN decision)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB give)
(NP (DT the) (NN authority))
(NP (DT the) (NN right)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB deny)
(NP (NNS services))
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NP (ADJP (RB developmentally) (JJ disabled)) (NNS adults))
(PP (IN with)
(NP (NP (NNS IQs))
(PP (IN over)
(NP (CD 70)))))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
In addition to serving as the nation’s final court of appeals, the Supreme Court of Czechoslovakia examined the legality of decisions of the federal government and, in general, ensured the uniform interpretation of the laws.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (PP (IN In)
(NP (NP (NN addition))
(PP (TO to)
(S (VP (VBG serving)
(PP (IN as)
(NP (NP (NP (DT the) (NN nation) (POS 's)) (JJ final) (NN court))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NNS appeals))))
(, ,)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Supreme) (NNP Court))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NNP Czechoslovakia))))
(VP (VP (VBD examined)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN legality))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (NNS decisions))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (JJ federal) (NN government))))
(CC and)
(VP (, ,)
(PP (IN in)
(ADJP (JJ general)))
(, ,) (VBD ensured)
(NP (NP (DT the) (JJ uniform) (NN interpretation))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NNS laws)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
In addition to the main thesis of Empire, Williams also engages in brief discussions of capitalism as it applies to empire and the notion that freedom and prosperity must be sustained by constant physical and economic expansion (returning quite a few times to Locke’s statement that’ ‘riches’’ consist in having more than the rest of the world), the increasing disinterest of American citizens in the process and decisions of their own government and subsequent reduction of power that substitutes real decision – making with the more – illusory power of merely choosing between options proposed by “The Establishment’ ’, the ties between government and business, and the pessimistic prediction that empire will some day soon come crashing down.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (PP (IN In)
(NP (NP (NN addition))
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NP (DT the) (JJ main) (NN thesis))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NNP Empire))))
(, ,)
(NP (NNP Williams)) (ADVP (RB also))
(VP (VBZ engages)
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (JJ brief) (NNS discussions))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NN capitalism)
(SBAR (IN as)
(S (NP (PRP it))
(VP (VBZ applies)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NP (NN empire)) (CC and)
(NP (DT the) (NN notion)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (NN freedom) (CC and) (NN prosperity))
(VP (MD must)
(VP (AUX be)
(VP (VBN sustained)
(PP (IN by)
(NP (NP (JJ constant) (NN physical)) (CC and)
(NP (JJ economic) (NN expansion))))
(S (-LRB- -LRB-)
(S (VP (VBG returning) (ADVP (RB quite)
(NP (DT a) (JJ few) (NNS times)))
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NP (NNP Locke) (POS 's)) (NN statement)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (VP (POS ') ('' ')
(NP (NNS riches)) ('' ') (PRN ('' ')
(VP (VBP consist)
(PP (IN in)
(S (VP (AUXG having)
(ADJP (JJR more)
(PP (IN than)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN rest))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN world))))
(-RRB- -RRB-)) (, ,)
(NP (NP (NP (NP (DT the) (VBG increasing) (NN disinterest))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (NP (NNP American) (NNS citizens))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (DT the) (NN process))))
(CC and)
(NP (NP (NNS decisions))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (PRP$ their) (JJ own) (NN government))))
(CC and)
(NP (NP (JJ subsequent) (NN reduction))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NN power)))))
(PP (IN that)
(NP (NNS substitutes)))
(NP (JJ real) (NN decision))))
(: -)
(VP (VBG making)
(PP (IN with)
(S (X (DT the) (JJR more)) (: -)
(NP (NP (JJ illusory) (NN power))
(PP (IN of)
(S (ADVP (RB merely))
(VP (VBG choosing)
(PP (IN between)
(NP (NP (NNS options))
(VP (VBN proposed)
(PP (IN by) ('' ')
(NP (: ')
(NP (NP (DT The) (NN Establishment) (POS ')) ('' ')) (, ,)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NNS ties))
(PP (IN between)
(NP (NN government) (CC and) (NN business))))
(, ,) (CC and)
(NP (NP (DT the) (JJ pessimistic) (NN prediction))
(SBAR (WHNP (WDT that) (NN empire))
(S (VP (MD will) (ADVP (NP (DT some) (NN day)) (RB soon))
(VP (VB come)
(S (VP (VBG crashing) (PRT (RP down)))))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
Yugoslavs – especially Croats – were infuriated with the decision of the Yugoslav government with the treaty calling it treasonous.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NP (NNS Yugoslavs)) (PRN (: -) (ADVP (RB especially))
(NP (NNP Croats)) (: -)))
(VP (AUX were)
(VP (VBN infuriated)
(PP (IN with)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN decision))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NNP Yugoslav) (NN government)))
(PP (IN with)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN treaty))
(VP (VBG calling)
(S (NP (PRP it))
(ADJP (JJ treasonous))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
“The nomination of Advisors and Assistants of 7 Deputy Prime Ministers shows that the decisions of the Royal Government are being violated, and Samdech Akkak Moha Senapadei Dekchor Hun Sen is the person who is at the head, leading this strong abuse of decisions of the Royal Government of Cambodia.
(Parse)
(S1 (S ('' ') (: ')
(NP (NP (DT The) (NN nomination))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NNPS Advisors) (CC and) (NNS Assistants)))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (CD 7) (NNP Deputy) (NNP Prime) (NNP Ministers))))
(VP (VBZ shows)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (S (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS decisions))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NNP Royal) (NN Government))))
(VP (AUX are)
(VP (AUXG being)
(VP (VBN violated)))))
(, ,) (CC and)
(S (NP (NNP Samdech) (NNP Akkak) (NNP Moha) (NNP Senapadei) (NNP Dekchor) (NNP Hun) (NNP Sen))
(VP (AUX is)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN person))
(SBAR (WHNP (WP who))
(S (VP (AUX is)
(PP (IN at)
(NP (DT the) (NN head)))
(, ,)
(S (VP (VBG leading)
(NP (NP (DT this) (JJ strong) (NN abuse))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (NNS decisions))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NNP Royal) (NN Government)))))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NNP Cambodia)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Her comparison of hypothetical body counts between a Labour and National Government’s decision to deploy troops to Iraq represents an all – time low in politics, and in the personal standards of a Party once proud to stand for ordinary decent Kiwis.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NP (PRP$ Her) (NN comparison))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (JJ hypothetical) (NN body) (NNS counts)))
(PP (IN between)
(NP (NP (DT a) (NNP Labour) (CC and) (NNP National) (NN Government) (POS 's)) (NN decision)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB deploy)
(NP (NNS troops))
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NNP Iraq)))
(VP (VBZ represents)
(NP (DT an) (DT all)) (: -)
(NP (NP (NN time))
(ADJP (ADJP (JJ low)
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NNS politics))))
(, ,) (CC and)
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (DT the) (JJ personal) (NNS standards))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT a) (NN Party)))))
(ADJP (RB once) (JJ proud)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB stand)
(PP (IN for)
(NP (JJ ordinary) (JJ decent) (NNS Kiwis))))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
Following a decision of the Thai government on May 15 2007, all of the 81 minor districts were to be upgraded to full districts.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (PP (VBG Following)
(NP (NP (NP (DT a) (NN decision))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NNP Thai) (NN government)))
(PP (IN on)
(NP (NNP May) (CD 15))))
(NP (CD 2007))))
(, ,)
(NP (NP (DT all))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (CD 81) (JJ minor) (NNS districts))))
(VP (AUX were)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (AUX be)
(VP (VBN upgraded)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (JJ full) (NNS districts)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
So onto the first bit of news: the U.S. government’s decision to take North Korea off its list of terrorist groups, a development that augurs great changes for the future of mankind.
(Parse)
(S1 (FRAG (ADVP (RB So))
(PP (IN onto)
(NP (NP (DT the) (JJ first) (NN bit))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NN news)))))
(: :)
(NP (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP U.S.) (NN government) (POS 's)) (NN decision)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB take)
(NP (NNP North) (NNP Korea))
(PP (IN off)
(NP (NP (PRP$ its) (NN list))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (JJ terrorist) (NNS groups)))
(, ,)
(NP (NP (DT a) (NN development))
(SBAR (WHNP (WDT that))
(S (VP (VBZ augurs)
(NP (JJ great) (NNS changes))
(PP (IN for)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN future))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NN mankind))))
(. .)))
And 1,831 more sentences.
NB: Do not link to this page – the URL for this factoid will change every time the available knowledge base is updated.