[〈det (plur person.n)〉 have.v 〈det prosecution.n〉]
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Danielle Tavernier, spokeswoman for the Orange – Osceola State Attorney’s Office, said they are not disclosing any details of their prosecution, but that Anthony had been’ ’ invited to our office to shed light on the disappearance of the victim in this case.”
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NP (NNP Danielle) (NNP Tavernier)) (, ,)
(NP (NP (NN spokeswoman))
(PP (IN for)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Orange) (: -) (NNP Osceola) (NNP State) (NNP Attorney) (POS 's)) (NN Office))))
(, ,))
(VP (VBD said)
(SBAR (SBAR (S (NP (PRP they))
(VP (AUX are) (RB not)
(VP (VBG disclosing)
(NP (NP (DT any) (NNS details))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (PRP$ their) (NN prosecution)))))
(, ,) (CC but)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (NNP Anthony))
(VP (AUX had)
(VP (AUX been) ('' ') (: ')
(VP (VBN invited)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (PRP$ our) (NN office)))
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB shed)
(NP (NN light))
(PP (IN on)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN disappearance))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN victim))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (DT this) (NN case)))))
(. .) ('' ') ('' ')))
In Wikipedia:
When calling its ceasefire, the INLA acknowledged the ’faults and grievous errors in our prosecution of the war ’.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB When))
(S (VP (VBG calling)
(NP (PRP$ its) (NN ceasefire)))))
(, ,)
(NP (DT the) (NNP INLA))
(VP (VBD acknowledged)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NNS 'faults) (CC and) (JJ grievous) (NNS errors))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (PRP$ our) (NN prosecution))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN war) (POS '))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Ellsberg: That was the reason for their prosecution.
(Parse)
(S1 (NP (NP (NNP Ellsberg)) (: :)
(S (NP (DT That))
(VP (AUX was)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN reason))
(PP (IN for)
(NP (PRP$ their) (NN prosecution)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
As you may recall, the defendants invoked the WTO Gambling decision as a defense against their prosecution for various gambling related crimes.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (SBAR (IN As)
(S (NP (PRP you))
(VP (MD may)
(VP (VB recall)))))
(, ,)
(NP (DT the) (NNS defendants))
(VP (VBD invoked)
(NP (DT the) (NNP WTO) (NN Gambling) (NN decision))
(PP (IN as)
(NP (NP (DT a) (NN defense))
(PP (IN against)
(NP (NP (PRP$ their) (NN prosecution))
(PP (IN for)
(NP (JJ various) (NN gambling) (VBN related) (NNS crimes)))))
(. .)))
In the British National Corpus:
Chrissie can not deny that she took the items, but she might well argue that she thought Fred had the authority to let her have them, and unless we can show that she had been told otherwise our prosecution might well fail, especially since the law traditionally recognizes that “perks” are a feature of the catering industry.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (NP (NNP Chrissie))
(VP (MD can) (RB not)
(VP (VB deny)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (PRP she))
(VP (VBD took)
(NP (DT the) (NNS items)))))
(, ,) (CC but)
(S (NP (PRP she))
(VP (MD might) (ADVP (RB well))
(VP (VB argue)
(SBAR (SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (PRP she))
(VP (VBD thought)
(SBAR (S (NP (NNP Fred))
(VP (AUX had)
(NP (DT the) (NN authority)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB let)
(NP (PRP her))
(VP (AUX have)
(NP (PRP them))))
(, ,) (CC and)
(SBAR (IN unless)
(S (NP (PRP we))
(VP (MD can)
(VP (VB show)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (PRP she))
(VP (AUX had)
(VP (AUX been)
(VP (VBN told)
(SBAR (RB otherwise)
(S (NP (PRP$ our) (NN prosecution))
(VP (MD might) (ADVP (RB well))
(VP (VB fail)))))
(, ,)
(SBAR (ADVP (RB especially)) (IN since)
(S (NP (DT the) (NN law)) (ADVP (RB traditionally))
(VP (VBZ recognizes)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S ('' '')
(NP (NNS perks)) ('' '')
(VP (AUX are)
(NP (NP (DT a) (NN feature))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN catering) (NN industry)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Something occurred to me during my testimony for the US Attorney’s office and their prosecution of the CIETC 4 minus 1.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NN Something))
(VP (VBD occurred)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (PRP me)))
(PP (IN during)
(NP (PRP$ my) (NN testimony)))
(PP (IN for)
(NP (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP US) (NNP Attorney) (POS 's)) (NN office)) (CC and)
(NP (NP (PRP$ their) (NN prosecution))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NNP CIETC) (CD 4) (CC minus) (CD 1))))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
This led to an outbreak of patriotic fervour, and further increased the pressure on Walpole and Newcastle for their perceived unwilling prosecution of the war.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (DT This))
(VP (VP (VBD led)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NP (DT an) (NN outbreak))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (JJ patriotic) (NN fervour)))
(, ,) (CC and)
(VP (ADVP (RB further)) (VBD increased)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN pressure))
(PP (IN on)
(NP (NNP Walpole) (CC and) (NNP Newcastle)))
(PP (IN for)
(NP (NP (PRP$ their) (VBN perceived) (JJ unwilling) (NN prosecution))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN war)))))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
After his success at Chancellorsville in May 1863, Lee led his army through the Shenandoah Valley for his second invasion of the North, hoping to reach as far as Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, or even Philadelphia, and to influence Northern politicians to give up their prosecution of the war.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (PP (IN After)
(NP (NP (PRP$ his) (NN success))
(PP (IN at)
(NP (NNP Chancellorsville)))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NNP May) (CD 1863)))))
(, ,)
(NP (NNP Lee))
(VP (VBD led)
(NP (NP (PRP$ his) (NN army))
(PP (IN through)
(NP (DT the) (NNP Shenandoah) (NNP Valley)))
(PP (IN for)
(NP (NP (PRP$ his) (JJ second) (NN invasion))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NNP North)))
(, ,)
(S (VP (VBG hoping)
(S (VP (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB reach) (ADVP (RB as) (RB far))
(PP (IN as)
(NP (NP (NNP Harrisburg)) (, ,)
(NP (NNP Pennsylvania)) (, ,) (CC or) (RB even)
(NP (NNP Philadelphia)))
(, ,) (CC and)
(VP (TO to)
(VP (VB influence)
(S (NP (NNP Northern) (NNS politicians))
(VP (TO to)
(VP (VB give) (PRT (RP up))
(NP (NP (PRP$ their) (NN prosecution))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN war)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
The British, along with the rest of our allies, have faced heavy criticism for their prosecution of the war in the south.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (DT The) (NNPS British)) (, ,)
(PP (IN along)
(PP (IN with)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN rest))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (PRP$ our) (NNS allies)))
(, ,)
(VP (AUX have)
(VP (VBN faced)
(NP (JJ heavy) (NN criticism))
(PP (IN for)
(NP (NP (PRP$ their) (NN prosecution))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN war))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (DT the) (NN south)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
The boards will warn the licensees that they may one day be subject to prosecution if they participate in interrogations that do not conform to international standards of treatment of prisoners. “As professional licensure and codes of ethics are regulated by states, California has the obligation to notify members of laws concerning torture that may result in their prosecution,’ ’ said Ridley – Thomas. “No government has the authority to legalize torture, “Miles added “Torture is much more than a political issue, “Ridley – Thomas said.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (NP (DT The) (NNS boards))
(VP (MD will)
(VP (VB warn)
(NP (DT the) (NNS licensees))
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (PRP they))
(VP (MD may)
(NP (CD one) (NN day))
(VP (AUX be)
(ADJP (JJ subject)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NN prosecution))))
(SBAR (IN if)
(S (NP (PRP they))
(VP (VB participate)
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (NNS interrogations))
(SBAR (WHNP (WDT that))
(S (VP (AUX do) (RB not)
(VP (VB conform)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NP (JJ international) (NNS standards))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (NN treatment))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NNS prisoners)))))
(. .) ('' '))))
(: ')
(S (SBAR (IN As)
(S (NP (NP (JJ professional) (NN licensure) (CC and) (NNS codes))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NNS ethics))))
(VP (AUX are)
(VP (VBN regulated)
(PP (IN by)
(NP (NNS states))))
(, ,)
(NP (NNP California))
(VP (AUX has)
(NP (DT the) (NN obligation)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB notify)
(NP (NP (NNS members))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (NNS laws))
(VP (VBG concerning)
(S (VP (VBP torture)
(SBAR (S (NP (DT that))
(VP (MD may)
(VP (VB result)
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (PRP$ their) (NN prosecution)) (PRN (, ,) ('' ') ('' ')
(S (VP (VBD said)
(NP (NNP Ridley)))))
(: -)
(NP (NNP Thomas))))
(. .) ('' ')) (: ')
(S (S (NP (DT No) (NN government))
(VP (AUX has)
(NP (DT the) (NN authority)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB legalize)
(NP (VB torture)))))
(, ,) ('' ') ('' ')
(NP (NNP Miles))
(VP (VBD added)))
(: ')
(S ('' ')
(S (NP (VBP Torture))
(VP (AUX is)
(ADJP (ADJP (RB much) (JJR more))
(PP (IN than)
(NP (DT a) (JJ political) (NN issue)))
(, ,) ('' ') ('' ')
(NP (NNP Ridley)) (: -)
(NP (NNP Thomas))
(VP (VBD said)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Aside from noting the ease with which a quick Google search will always be able to link Sampson with the disgraceful charges IUPUI laid against him, the editorial rightly takes IUPUI to task for the mockery their prosecution has made of the very real and complex issues of race and affirmative action on our college campuses.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (PP (RB Aside) (IN from)
(S (VP (VBG noting)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN ease))
(SBAR (WHPP (IN with) (WHNP (WDT which)))
(S (NP (DT a) (JJ quick) (NNP Google) (NN search))
(VP (MD will) (ADVP (RB always))
(VP (AUX be)
(ADJP (JJ able)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB link)
(NP (NNP Sampson))
(PP (IN with)
(NP (NP (DT the) (JJ disgraceful) (NNS charges))
(SBAR (S (NP (NNP IUPUI))
(VP (VBD laid)
(PP (IN against)
(NP (PRP him)))))
(, ,)
(NP (DT the) (NN editorial)) (ADVP (RB rightly))
(VP (VBZ takes)
(S (NP (NNP IUPUI))
(VP (TO to)
(VP (NN task)
(PP (IN for)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN mockery))
(SBAR (S (NP (PRP$ their) (NN prosecution))
(VP (AUX has)
(VP (VBN made)
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (DT the)
(ADJP (RB very) (JJ real) (CC and) (JJ complex)) (NNS issues))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (NN race) (CC and) (JJ affirmative) (NN action))
(PP (IN on)
(NP (PRP$ our) (NN college) (NNS campuses)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
“As professional licensure and codes of ethics are regulated by states, California has the obligation to notify members of laws concerning torture that may result in their prosecution,’ ’ said Ridley – Thomas.
(Parse)
(S1 (S ('' ') (: ')
(SBAR (IN As)
(S (NP (NP (JJ professional) (NN licensure) (CC and) (NNS codes))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NNS ethics))))
(VP (AUX are)
(VP (VBN regulated)
(PP (IN by)
(NP (NNS states))))
(, ,)
(NP (NNP California))
(VP (AUX has)
(NP (DT the) (NN obligation)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB notify)
(NP (NP (NNS members))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (NNS laws))
(VP (VBG concerning)
(NP (VB torture)
(SBAR (WHNP (WDT that))
(S (VP (MD may)
(VP (VB result)
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (PRP$ their) (NN prosecution)) (PRN (, ,) ('' ') ('' ')
(VP (VBD said)
(NP (NNP Ridley)))
(: -))
(NP (NNP Thomas)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
DE: That was the reason for their prosecution.
(Parse)
(S1 (NP (NP (NNP DE)) (: :)
(S (NP (DT That))
(VP (AUX was)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN reason))
(PP (IN for)
(NP (PRP$ their) (NN prosecution)))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
Spanish inquisitions were not exceptionally different from other European courts of the time in their prosecution of these offences, as many of these charges were viewed as part of a broad class of moral crimes that raised legitimate concern to spiritual and secular courts in an age when religion was regarded as the fundamental foundation of society (Peters 1988: 87).
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (JJ Spanish) (NNS inquisitions))
(VP (AUX were) (RB not)
(ADJP (RB exceptionally) (JJ different)
(PP (IN from)
(NP (JJ other) (NNP European) (NNS courts)))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN time))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (PRP$ their) (NN prosecution))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT these) (NNS offences)))))
(, ,)
(SBAR (IN as)
(S (NP (NP (JJ many))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT these) (NNS charges))))
(VP (AUX were)
(VP (VBN viewed)
(PP (IN as)
(NP (NP (NN part))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (DT a) (JJ broad) (NN class))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (JJ moral) (NNS crimes)))
(SBAR (WHNP (WDT that))
(S (VP (VBD raised)
(NP (JJ legitimate) (NN concern))
(PP (TO to)
(NP (JJ spiritual) (CC and) (JJ secular) (NNS courts)))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (DT an) (NN age))
(SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when))
(S (NP (NN religion))
(VP (AUX was)
(VP (VBN regarded)
(PP (IN as)
(NP (NP (DT the) (JJ fundamental) (NN foundation))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NN society)))
(PRN (-LRB- -LRB-)
(NP (NNP Peters) (CD 1988)) (: :)
(NP (CD 87)) (-RRB- -RRB-))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
They don’t have a good motive, unfortunately, for them and their prosecution.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (NP (PRP They))
(VP (AUX do) (RB n't)
(VP (AUX have)
(NP (DT a) (JJ good) (NN motive)))))
(, ,) (ADVP (RB unfortunately)) (, ,)
(PP (IN for)
(NP (NP (PRP them)) (CC and)
(NP (PRP$ their) (NN prosecution))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
As professional licensure and codes of ethics are regulated by states, California has the obligation to notify members of laws concerning torture that may result in their prosecution,? said Ridley – Thomas.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (SBAR (IN As)
(S (NP (NP (JJ professional) (NN licensure) (CC and) (NNS codes))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NNS ethics))))
(VP (AUX are)
(VP (VBN regulated)
(PP (IN by)
(NP (NNS states))))
(, ,)
(NP (NNP California))
(VP (AUX has)
(NP (DT the) (NN obligation)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB notify)
(NP (NP (NP (NNS members))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (NNS laws))
(VP (VBG concerning)
(NP (VB torture)
(SBAR (WHNP (WDT that))
(S (VP (MD may)
(VP (VB result)
(PP (IN in)
(NP (PRP$ their) (NN prosecution)))
(, ,))))
(. ?)))
(VP (VBD said)
(NP (NNP Ridley))))
(: -)
(NP (NNP Thomas)))))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
Ford commented, “I strongly felt that although I agreed with the goals of the Johnson administration in Vietnam, I vigorously criticized their prosecution of the war.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (NP (NNP Ford))
(VP (VBD commented)))
(, ,) ('' '')
(NP (PRP I))
(VP (ADVP (RB strongly)) (VBD felt)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (SBAR (IN although)
(S (NP (PRP I))
(VP (VBD agreed)
(PP (IN with)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NNS goals))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NNP Johnson) (NN administration)))))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NNP Vietnam)))
(, ,)
(NP (PRP I))
(VP (ADVP (RB vigorously)) (VBD criticized)
(NP (NP (PRP$ their) (NN prosecution))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN war)))))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
Despite dentistry becoming regulated, unlicensed dentists still practiced, often offering inferior services, prompting some to call for their prosecution.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (PP (IN Despite)
(S (NP (NNP dentistry))
(VP (VBG becoming)
(ADJP (JJ regulated)))))
(, ,)
(NP (JJ unlicensed) (NNS dentists)) (ADVP (RB still))
(VP (VBD practiced) (, ,)
(S (ADVP (RB often))
(VP (VBG offering)
(NP (JJ inferior) (NNS services))))
(, ,)
(S (VP (VBG prompting)
(S (NP (DT some))
(VP (TO to)
(VP (VB call)
(PP (IN for)
(NP (PRP$ their) (NN prosecution)))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
They were subsequently arrested and tried in 1991 after 110 MPs signed a motion calling for their prosecution and the right – wing Freedom Association threatened to bring a private prosecution.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (NP (PRP They))
(VP (AUX were)
(VP (VP (ADVP (RB subsequently)) (VBN arrested)) (CC and)
(VP (VBN tried)
(PP (IN in)
(NP (CD 1991)))
(SBAR (IN after)
(S (NP (CD 110) (NNS MPs))
(VP (VBD signed)
(NP (NP (DT a) (NN motion))
(VP (VBG calling)
(PP (IN for)
(NP (NP (PRP$ their) (NN prosecution)) (CC and)
(NP (DT the) (NN right))))
(: -)
(S (NP (NN wing) (NNP Freedom) (NNP Association))
(VP (VBD threatened)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB bring)
(NP (DT a) (JJ private) (NN prosecution))))
(. .)))
And 113 more sentences.
NB: Do not link to this page – the URL for this factoid will change every time the available knowledge base is updated.