Learned by Reading
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
“The evidence was not conclusive, but why wait until we were certain when it appeared we needed to act quickly?
(Parse)
(S1 (SBARQ (PRN ('' ') ('' ')
(S (NP (DT The) (NN evidence))
(VP (AUX was) (RB not)
(ADJP (JJ conclusive))))
(, ,)) (CC but) (WHADVP (WRB why)) (SQ (VP (VB wait)
(SBAR (IN until)
(S (NP (PRP we))
(VP (AUX were)
(ADJP (JJ certain))
(SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when))
(S (NP (PRP it))
(VP (VBD appeared)
(SBAR (S (NP (PRP we))
(VP (VBD needed)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB act) (ADVP (RB quickly))))
(. ?)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
In addition, while the evidence is less conclusive, intensive therapy may also improve long – term macrovascular comorbidities.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (PP (IN In)
(NP (NN addition)))
(, ,)
(SBAR (IN while)
(S (NP (DT the) (NN evidence))
(VP (AUX is)
(ADJP (RBR less) (JJ conclusive)))))
(, ,)
(NP (JJ intensive) (NN therapy))
(VP (MD may) (ADVP (RB also))
(VP (VB improve) (ADVP (RB long)) (: -)
(NP (NN term) (JJ macrovascular) (NNS comorbidities))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
By now that evidence, Evans said, has become pretty conclusive.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (PP (IN By) (ADVP (RB now)))
(NP (NP (DT that) (NN evidence)) (PRN (, ,)
(S (NP (NNP Evans))
(VP (VBD said)))
(, ,)))
(VP (AUX has)
(VP (VBN become)
(ADJP (RB pretty) (JJ conclusive))))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
While there is no conclusive evidence for this explanation, the word football has always implied a variety of games played on foot, not just those that involved kicking a ball.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (SBAR (IN While)
(S (NP (EX there))
(VP (AUX is)
(NP (NP (DT no) (JJ conclusive) (NN evidence))
(PP (IN for)
(NP (DT this) (NN explanation))))
(, ,)
(NP (DT the) (NN word) (NN football))
(VP (AUX has) (ADVP (RB always))
(VP (VBN implied)
(NP (NP (DT a) (NN variety))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (NNS games))
(VP (VBN played)
(PP (IN on)
(NP (NP (NN foot)) (, ,) (CONJP (RB not) (RB just))
(NP (NP (DT those))
(SBAR (WHNP (WDT that))
(S (VP (VBD involved)
(S (VP (VBG kicking)
(NP (DT a) (NN ball))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Conclusive evidence that the New York Times is actually in the tank for Obama.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NP (JJ Conclusive) (NN evidence))
(PP (IN that)
(NP (DT the) (NNP New) (NNP York) (NNP Times))))
(VP (AUX is) (ADVP (RB actually))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (DT the) (NN tank)))
(PP (IN for)
(NP (NNP Obama))))
(. .)))
In the British National Corpus:
Conclusive evidence that the sources of jade exploited in early Mexico were indigenous, like the economy and culture of the region itself, has been demonstrated only in comparatively recent times.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NP (JJ Conclusive) (NN evidence))
(SBAR (WHNP (IN that))
(S (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS sources))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (NN jade))
(VP (VBN exploited)
(PP (IN in)
(NP (JJ early) (NNP Mexico))))
(VP (AUX were)
(ADJP (JJ indigenous)))
(, ,)
(PP (IN like)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN economy)) (CC and)
(NP (NP (NN culture))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN region)))
(NP (PRP itself)))))
(, ,)
(VP (AUX has)
(VP (AUX been)
(VP (VBN demonstrated) (ADVP (RB only))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (RB comparatively) (JJ recent) (NNS times)))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
Ednyfed probably went on a crusade to the Holy Land around 1235, although the evidence is not conclusive.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NNP Ednyfed)) (ADVP (RB probably))
(VP (VBD went)
(PP (IN on)
(NP (NP (DT a) (NN crusade))
(PP (TO to)
(NP (DT the) (NNP Holy) (NNP Land)))))
(PP (IN around)
(NP (CD 1235)))
(, ,)
(SBAR (IN although)
(S (NP (DT the) (NN evidence))
(VP (AUX is) (RB not)
(ADJP (JJ conclusive)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
I know experts have already said, since the beginning, that it was a raccoon, but not that I’m saying they are wrong, but I do suspect otherwise and would love to see more conclusive evidence.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (PRP I))
(VP (VBP know)
(SBAR (S (NP (NNS experts))
(VP (AUX have) (ADVP (RB already))
(VP (VBN said) (, ,)
(PP (IN since)
(NP (DT the) (NN beginning)))
(, ,)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (PRP it))
(VP (AUX was) (UCP (NP (DT a) (NN raccoon)) (, ,) (CC but) (RB not)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (S (NP (PRP I))
(VP (AUX 'm)
(VP (VBG saying)
(SBAR (S (NP (PRP they))
(VP (AUX are)
(ADJP (JJ wrong)))))
(, ,) (CC but)
(S (NP (PRP I))
(VP (VP (AUX do)
(NP (NN suspect)) (ADVP (RB otherwise)))
(CC and)
(VP (MD would)
(VP (VB love)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB see)
(NP (JJR more) (JJ conclusive) (NN evidence)))))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
From this, it is argued that Connect6 is fair in the following senses: However, this evidence is not conclusive.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (PP (IN From)
(NP (DT this)))
(, ,)
(NP (PRP it))
(VP (AUX is)
(VP (VBN argued)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (NNP Connect6))
(VP (AUX is)
(ADJP (JJ fair))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (DT the) (JJ following) (NNS senses)))
(: :)
(S (ADVP (RB However)) (, ,)
(NP (DT this) (NN evidence))
(VP (AUX is) (RB not)
(ADJP (JJ conclusive))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Cappella provide the first conclusive evidence voter cynicism by closely monitoring media coverage among sample audiences book with far – ranging implications for the future of free.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (JJ Cappella))
(VP (VBP provide)
(NP (DT the) (JJ first) (JJ conclusive) (NN evidence))
(NP (NN voter) (NN cynicism))
(PP (IN by)
(S (VP (ADVP (RB closely)) (VBG monitoring)
(NP (NN media) (NN coverage))
(PP (IN among)
(NP (NP (NP (NN sample) (NNS audiences))
(VP (NN book)
(PP (IN with) (ADVP (RB far)))))
(: -)
(NP (NP (VBG ranging) (NNS implications))
(PP (IN for)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN future))
(PP (IN of)
(ADJP (JJ free)))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
No conclusive evidence has been given on its real origins.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (DT No) (JJ conclusive) (NN evidence))
(VP (AUX has)
(VP (AUX been)
(VP (VBN given)
(PP (IN on)
(NP (PRP$ its) (JJ real) (NNS origins)))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
There is conclusive evidence, on the other hand, that the two principal native American species of cotton (“Gossypium hirsutum” and “Gossypium barbadense”) were cultivated by indigenous Americans long before any of the claimed contacts occurred.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (EX There))
(VP (AUX is)
(NP (JJ conclusive) (NN evidence)) (, ,)
(PP (IN on)
(NP (DT the) (JJ other) (NN hand)))
(, ,)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (NP (DT the) (CD two) (JJ principal) (JJ native) (NNP American) (NNS species))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NN cotton)))
(PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (FRAG (FRAG ('' '')
(NP (NNP Gossypium) (NN hirsutum)) ('' '')) (CC and) (FRAG ('' '')
(NP (NNP Gossypium) (NN barbadense)) ('' '')))
(-RRB- -RRB-)))
(VP (AUX were)
(VP (VBN cultivated)
(PP (IN by)
(NP (JJ indigenous) (NNPS Americans)))
(SBAR (ADVP (RB long)) (IN before)
(S (NP (NP (DT any))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (VBN claimed) (NNS contacts))))
(VP (VBD occurred)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
And the evidence that aspirin use can lower your colon cancer risk is not conclusive.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (CC And)
(NP (DT the) (NN evidence)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (NN aspirin) (NN use))
(VP (MD can)
(VP (VB lower)
(NP (PRP$ your) (NN colon) (NN cancer) (NN risk))))
(VP (AUX is) (RB not)
(ADJP (JJ conclusive)))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
Indeed, recent events furnished us with the most conclusive evidence that many of the British officers, entrusted with grave authority in India, had, from an ignorance of popular customs and a disregard of national habits and traditions, given great cause of complaint and encouragement to disaffection.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (ADVP (RB Indeed)) (, ,)
(NP (JJ recent) (NNS events))
(VP (VBN furnished)
(NP (PRP us))
(PP (IN with)
(NP (NP (DT the)
(ADJP (RBS most) (JJ conclusive)) (NN evidence))
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (NP (JJ many))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (JJ British) (NNS officers))))
(, ,)
(S (VP (VBN entrusted)
(PP (IN with)
(NP (NP (JJ grave) (NN authority))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NNP India))))
(, ,)
(VP (AUX had) (, ,)
(PP (IN from)
(NP (NP (DT an) (NN ignorance))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (JJ popular) (NNS customs)) (CC and)
(NP (NP (DT a) (VB disregard))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (JJ national) (NNS habits) (CC and) (NNS traditions)))))
(, ,)
(VP (VBN given)
(NP (NP (JJ great) (NN cause))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (NN complaint)) (CC and)
(NP (NN encouragement)))))
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NN disaffection))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
CHENEY: Well, the evidence is pretty conclusive that the Iraqis have indeed harbored terrorists.
(Parse)
(S1 (NP (NP (NNP CHENEY)) (: :)
(S (INTJ (UH Well)) (, ,)
(NP (DT the) (NN evidence))
(VP (AUX is)
(ADJP (RB pretty) (JJ conclusive))
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (DT the) (NNPS Iraqis))
(VP (AUX have) (ADVP (RB indeed))
(VP (VBN harbored)
(NP (NNS terrorists)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Yeah, it’s only spray – on lotion, but I’m pretty sure this is conclusive evidence that either God doesn’t exist or is drunk again.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (INTJ (UH Yeah)) (, ,)
(NP (PRP it))
(VP (AUX 's) (ADVP (RB only))
(NP (NN spray)) (: -)
(PP (IN on)
(NP (NN lotion)))))
(, ,) (CC but)
(S (NP (PRP I))
(VP (AUX 'm)
(ADJP (RB pretty) (JJ sure)
(SBAR (S (NP (DT this))
(VP (AUX is)
(NP (JJ conclusive) (NN evidence)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (DT either) (NNP God))
(VP (VP (AUX does) (RB n't)
(VP (VB exist)))
(CC or)
(VP (AUX is)
(ADJP (JJ drunk)) (ADVP (RB again))))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
The evidence is not conclusive, though.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (DT The) (NN evidence))
(VP (AUX is) (RB not)
(ADJP (JJ conclusive)) (, ,) (ADVP (RB though)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
The evidence was not conclusive, but why wait until we were certain when it appeared we needed to act quickly?
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (NP (DT The) (NN evidence))
(VP (AUX was) (RB not)
(ADJP (JJ conclusive))))
(, ,) (CC but) (SBARQ (WHADVP (WRB why)) (SQ (VP (VB wait)
(SBAR (IN until)
(S (NP (PRP we))
(VP (AUX were)
(ADJP (JJ certain))
(SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when))
(S (NP (PRP it))
(VP (VBD appeared)
(SBAR (S (NP (PRP we))
(VP (VBD needed)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB act) (ADVP (RB quickly))))
(. ?))))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Either way, its believed that the evidence wasn’t conclusive enough to convict with manslaughter in a trial, a 50 / 50 chance.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (DT Either) (NN way)) (, ,)
(NP (PRP$ its))
(VP (VBN believed)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (DT the) (NN evidence))
(VP (AUX was) (RB n't)
(ADJP (JJ conclusive) (RB enough)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB convict)
(PP (IN with)
(NP (NP (NN manslaughter))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (DT a) (NN trial)) (, ,)
(NP (DT a) (CD 50) (NNP /) (CD 50) (NN chance)))))
(. .)))
And 1,313 more sentences.