Learned by Reading
In Wikipedia:
Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, described the approach of the movement’s proponents as “a disarming subterfuge designed to undermine solid evidence that all living things share a common ancestry.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NP (NNP Lynn)) (, ,)
(NP (NP (JJ executive) (NN director))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NNPS Americans) (NX (NNP United))))
(PP (IN for)
(NP (NP (NN Separation))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NNP Church) (CC and) (NNP State)))
(, ,))
(VP (VBD described)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN approach))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN movement) (POS 's)) (NNS proponents))))
(PP (IN as) ('' '')
(NP (NP (DT a) (VBG disarming) (NN subterfuge))
(VP (VBN designed)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB undermine)
(NP (JJ solid) (NN evidence)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (DT all) (NN living) (NNS things))
(VP (VBP share)
(NP (DT a) (JJ common) (NN ancestry))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
UNITED NATIONS, Aug 13 (IPS) – While the United States has repeatedly accused Iran of providing lethal weapons to Shiite militias, last week, U.S. officials once again failed to provide solid evidence
(Parse)
(S1 (FRAG (NP (NNP UNITED) (NNPS NATIONS)) (, ,)
(NP (NNP Aug) (CD 13)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-)
(NP (NNP IPS)) (-RRB- -RRB-)) (: -)
(S (SBAR (IN While)
(S (NP (DT the) (NNP United) (NNPS States))
(VP (AUX has) (ADVP (RB repeatedly))
(VP (VBN accused)
(NP (NNP Iran))
(PP (IN of)
(S (VP (VBG providing)
(NP (JJ lethal) (NNS weapons))
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NNP Shiite) (NNS militias)))
(, ,)
(NP (JJ last) (NN week)))
(, ,)
(NP (NNP U.S.) (NNS officials)) (ADVP (RB once) (RB again))
(VP (VBD failed)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB provide)
(NP (JJ solid) (NN evidence)))))))))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
He’d worked hundreds of cases before where the evidence wasn’t as solid and they had gotten a conviction.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (PRP He))
(VP (AUX 'd)
(VP (VBN worked)
(NP (NP (NNS hundreds))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (NNS cases))
(SBAR (WHADVP (RB before) (WRB where))
(S (S (NP (DT the) (NN evidence))
(VP (AUX was) (RB n't)
(ADJP (RB as) (JJ solid))))
(CC and)
(S (NP (PRP they))
(VP (AUX had)
(VP (VBN gotten)
(NP (DT a) (NN conviction)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
The evidence will be solid.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (DT The) (NN evidence))
(VP (MD will)
(VP (AUX be)
(ADJP (JJ solid))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
“Does Avalos offer’ ’ solid evidence’ ’ or evidence mixed with his values, outlook, and worldview?
(Parse)
(S1 (S ('' ') ('' ')
(NP (NNP Does) (NNPS Avalos) (NN offer))
(VP (POS ') ('' ')
(NP (NP (JJ solid) (NN evidence)) ('' ') ('' ') (CC or)
(NP (NP (NN evidence))
(VP (VBN mixed)
(PP (IN with)
(NP (PRP$ his) (NNS values) (, ,) (NN outlook) (, ,) (CC and) (NN worldview))))
(. ?)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
However, the state needs to make sure the evidence against him is solid before it puts him to death.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (ADVP (RB However)) (, ,)
(NP (DT the) (NN state))
(VP (VBZ needs)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB make)
(ADJP (JJ sure)
(SBAR (S (NP (NP (DT the) (NN evidence))
(PP (IN against)
(NP (PRP him))))
(VP (AUX is)
(ADJP (JJ solid))
(SBAR (IN before)
(S (NP (PRP it))
(VP (VBZ puts)
(NP (PRP him))
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NN death)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
And the evidence on this one is pretty solid.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (CC And)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN evidence))
(PP (IN on)
(NP (DT this) (CD one))))
(VP (AUX is)
(ADJP (RB pretty) (JJ solid)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Even if they all knew the truth, there was no solid evidence.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (SBAR (RB Even) (IN if)
(S (NP (PRP they)) (DT all)
(VP (VBD knew)
(NP (DT the) (NN truth)))))
(, ,)
(NP (EX there))
(VP (AUX was)
(NP (DT no) (JJ solid) (NN evidence)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
“Basically, we caught him red-handed…. the evidence is solid,’ ’ said Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Luis Fraticelli during a press conference along with U.S. Attorney Rosa Emilia Rodrguez and other officials from that agency.
(Parse)
(S1 (SINV (PRN ('' ') ('' ')
(S (ADVP (RB Basically)) (, ,)
(NP (PRP we))
(VP (VBN caught)
(S (NP (PRP him))
(ADJP (JJ red-handed))))
(: ...) (. .)))
(S (NP (DT the) (NN evidence))
(VP (AUX is)
(ADJP (JJ solid))))
(, ,) ('' ') ('' ')
(VP (VBD said)
(NP (NP (NNP Federal) (NNP Bureau))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NNP Investigation)))
(PRN (-LRB- -LRB-)
(NP (NNP FBI)) (-RRB- -RRB-))))
(NP (NNP Director) (NNP Luis) (NNP Fraticelli))
(PP (IN during)
(NP (DT a) (NN press) (NN conference)))
(PP (IN along)
(PP (IN with)
(NP (NP (NNP U.S.) (NNP Attorney) (NNP Rosa) (NNP Emilia) (NNP Rodrguez)) (CC and)
(NP (NP (JJ other) (NNS officials))
(PP (IN from)
(NP (DT that) (NN agency))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Columnist Eugene Robinson expressed his surprise, highlighting the inconsistency of waging a “War on Terror’ ’: “I’ll wager that the evidence against Posada, which I find compelling, is more solid than the secret evidence against most of the detainees at Guantanamo.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (NP (NN Columnist) (NNP Eugene) (NNP Robinson))
(VP (VBD expressed)
(NP (PRP$ his) (NN surprise)) (, ,)
(S (VP (VBG highlighting)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN inconsistency))
(PP (IN of)
(S (VP (VBG waging)
(NP (NP (NP (NNP a) (POS ')) (: ')
(NP (NP (NNP War))
(PP (IN on)
(NP (NN Terror)))))
('' ') ('' ') (: :) ('' '))))
(: ')
(S (NP (PRP I))
(VP (MD 'll)
(VP (VB wager)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (NP (DT the) (NN evidence))
(PP (IN against)
(NP (NP (NNP Posada)) (, ,)
(SBAR (WHNP (WDT which))
(S (NP (PRP I))
(VP (VBP find)
(ADJP (JJ compelling)))))
(, ,))))
(VP (AUX is)
(ADJP (RBR more) (JJ solid)
(PP (IN than)
(NP (NP (DT the) (JJ secret) (NN evidence))
(PP (IN against)
(NP (NP (JJS most))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NNS detainees))
(PP (IN at)
(NP (NNP Guantanamo))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Then there shouldn’t be any solid evidence of his death.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (ADVP (RB Then))
(NP (EX there))
(VP (MD should) (RB n't)
(VP (AUX be)
(NP (NP (DT any) (JJ solid) (NN evidence))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (PRP$ his) (NN death)))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
There’s reasonably solid evidence for IQ differences, personality and behavior differences.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (EX There))
(VP (AUX 's) (ADVP (RB reasonably))
(NP (NP (JJ solid) (NN evidence))
(PP (IN for)
(NP (NNP IQ) (NNS differences) (, ,) (NN personality) (CC and) (NN behavior) (NNS differences)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Moreover, the evidence for man-made climate change is solid enough that it doesn’t need to be bolstered by iffy claims.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (ADVP (RB Moreover)) (, ,)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN evidence))
(PP (IN for)
(NP (JJ man-made) (NN climate) (NN change))))
(VP (VBZ is)
(ADJP (JJ solid) (RB enough)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (PRP it))
(VP (AUX does) (RB n't)
(VP (AUX need)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (AUX be)
(VP (VBN bolstered)
(PP (IN by)
(NP (JJ iffy) (NNS claims))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
I can *n’t confirm that the evidence is solid, I can meerly give my own account that strongly hints at it being solid.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (PRP I))
(VP (MD can)
(VP (NNP *) (RB n't)
(VP (VB confirm)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (DT the) (NN evidence))
(VP (AUX is)
(ADJP (JJ solid)) (, ,)
(S (NP (PRP I))
(VP (MD can) (RB meerly)
(VP (VB give)
(NP (NP (PRP$ my) (JJ own) (NN account))
(SBAR (WHNP (WDT that))
(S (VP (ADVP (RB strongly)) (VBZ hints)
(PP (IN at)
(S (NP (PRP it))
(VP (AUXG being)
(ADJP (JJ solid)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Filed under: Cellphones, Handhelds So we might not have a physical device here, but these packaging renderings are pretty solid evidence of exactly what BlackBerry fans on Verizon – particularly those jealous of the Bold – can expect in a few weeks’ time.
(Parse)
(S1 (FRAG (VP (VBN Filed)
(PP (IN under)))
(: :)
(S (S (NP (NNP Cellphones) (, ,) (NNP Handhelds) (RB So) (PRP we))
(VP (MD might) (RB not)
(VP (AUX have)
(NP (DT a) (JJ physical) (NN device)) (ADVP (RB here)))))
(, ,) (CC but)
(S (NP (DT these) (NN packaging) (NNS renderings))
(VP (AUX are)
(NP (NP (ADJP (RB pretty) (JJ solid)) (NN evidence))
(PP (IN of)
(SBAR (WHNP (RB exactly) (WP what))
(S (NP (NP (NP (JJ BlackBerry) (NNS fans))
(PP (IN on)
(NP (NNP Verizon))))
(: --)
(NP (NP (RB particularly) (DT those))
(ADJP (JJ jealous)
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (JJ Bold)))))
(: --))
(VP (MD can)
(VP (VB expect)
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (DT a) (JJ few) (NNS weeks) (POS ')) (NN time)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
The DA’s evidence was solid, carefully built up over years.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN DA) (POS 's)) (NN evidence))
(VP (AUX was)
(ADJP (ADJP (JJ solid)) (, ,)
(ADJP (RB carefully) (VBN built) (PRT (RP up))
(PP (IN over)
(NP (NNS years)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
The evidence against me is pretty solid.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN evidence))
(PP (IN against)
(NP (PRP me))))
(VP (AUX is)
(ADJP (RB pretty) (JJ solid)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
It was true that he could hold her there from the evidence he found, but he didn’t have enough solid evidence to say that she had anything to do with the robbery.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (NP (PRP It))
(VP (AUX was)
(ADJP (JJ true))
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (PRP he))
(VP (MD could)
(VP (VB hold)
(NP (PRP her)) (ADVP (RB there))
(PP (IN from)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN evidence))
(SBAR (S (NP (PRP he))
(VP (VBD found)))
(, ,) (CC but)
(S (NP (PRP he))
(VP (AUX did) (RB n't)
(VP (AUX have)
(NP (JJ enough) (JJ solid) (NN evidence)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB say)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (PRP she))
(VP (AUX had)
(NP (NP (NN anything))
(SBAR (S (VP (TO to)
(VP (AUX do)
(PP (IN with)
(NP (DT the) (NN robbery)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
In the only other significant judicial statement on BEOS, a judge in 2006 in Gujarat denied the test the status of? concluded proof? but wrote that it corroborated already solid evidence from other sources.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (PP (IN In)
(NP (NP (DT the) (JJ only) (JJ other) (JJ significant) (JJ judicial) (NN statement))
(PP (IN on)
(NP (NNP BEOS)))))
(, ,)
(NP (NP (DT a) (NN judge))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (CD 2006)))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NNP Gujarat))))
(VP (VP (VBD denied)
(SBAR (S (NP (DT the) (NN test))
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN status))
(PP (IN of)) (. ?))
(VP (VBD concluded)
(NP (NN proof)))
(. ?))))
(CC but)
(VP (VBD wrote)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (PRP it))
(VP (VBD corroborated) (ADVP (RB already))
(NP (JJ solid) (NN evidence))
(PP (IN from)
(NP (JJ other) (NNS sources)))))
(. .)))
And 1,253 more sentences.