Learned by Reading
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Roy Young, Allen Weiss and David Stewart show that marketing can and should focus on more than just the “Promotion’ ’ aspect of marketing.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NP (NNP Roy) (NNP Young)) (, ,)
(NP (NNP Allen) (NNP Weiss)) (CC and)
(NP (NNP David) (NNP Stewart)))
(VP (VBP show)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (NN marketing))
(VP (MD can) (CC and) (MD should)
(VP (VB focus)
(PP (IN on)
(NP (NP (ADJP (JJR more)
(PP (IN than)
(NP (RB just) (DT the) ('' ') (: ')
(NP (NNP Promotion) (POS ')))))
('' ') (NN aspect))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NN marketing))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
In the last few days both HRC and the NSD have denied these aligations (but NSD has NEVER denied that the email was sent from Steve Driscoll) but Michael Petrelis has shown that HRC isn’t above giving money to Republicans.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (PP (IN In)
(NP (DT the) (JJ last) (JJ few) (NNS days)))
(S (NP (PDT both)
(NP (NNP HRC)) (CC and)
(NP (DT the) (NNP NSD)))
(VP (AUX have)
(VP (VBN denied)
(NP (DT these) (NNS aligations)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (CC but)
(S (NP (NNP NSD))
(VP (AUX has) (ADVP (RB NEVER))
(VP (VBN denied)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (DT the) (NN email))
(VP (AUX was)
(VP (VBN sent)
(PP (IN from)
(NP (NNP Steve) (NNP Driscoll))))
(-RRB- -RRB-)))))
(CC but)
(S (NP (NNP Michael) (NNP Petrelis))
(VP (AUX has)
(VP (VBN shown)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (NNP HRC))
(VP (AUX is) (RB n't)
(PP (IN above)
(S (VP (VBG giving)
(NP (NN money))
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NNPS Republicans)))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
He showed that administering penicillin inhibits certain bacteria in tadpoles, which then fail to mature into frogs.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (PRP He))
(VP (VBD showed)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (JJ administering) (NN penicillin))
(VP (VBZ inhibits)
(NP (JJ certain) (NNS bacteria))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (NNS tadpoles)) (, ,)
(SBAR (WHNP (WDT which))
(S (ADVP (RB then))
(VP (VBP fail)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB mature)
(PP (IN into)
(NP (NNS frogs)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
I don’t know why I tell myself that he doesn’t care… he shows that he does in little pieces.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (PRP I))
(VP (AUX do) (RB n't)
(VP (VB know)
(SBAR (WHADVP (WRB why))
(S (NP (PRP I))
(VP (VBP tell)
(NP (PRP myself))
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (PRP he))
(VP (AUX does) (RB n't)
(VP (VB care) (ADVP (RB ..) (. .))
(SBAR (S (NP (PRP he))
(VP (VBZ shows)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (PRP he))
(VP (AUX does)
(PP (IN in)
(NP (JJ little) (NNS pieces)))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
In 1991, he showed that radiative corrections to the mass of the lightest Higgs boson in minimal supersymmetric models increased that mass beyond the reach of the LEP searches.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (PP (IN In)
(NP (CD 1991)))
(, ,)
(NP (PRP he))
(VP (VBD showed)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (NP (JJ radiative) (NNS corrections))
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN mass))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (DT the) (JJS lightest) (NNP Higgs) (NN boson))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (JJ minimal) (JJ supersymmetric) (NNS models)))))
(VP (VBD increased)
(NP (DT that) (NN mass))
(PP (IN beyond)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN reach))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NNP LEP) (NNS searches)))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
However, although Scrooge will go to great lengths to defend his wealth, he has always shown that he values his family more, trading his wealth for their safety (although he manages to get it back in the end).
(Parse)
(S1 (S (ADVP (RB However)) (, ,)
(SBAR (IN although)
(S (NP (NNP Scrooge))
(VP (MD will)
(VP (VB go)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (JJ great) (NNS lengths)))
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB defend)
(NP (PRP$ his) (NN wealth)))
(, ,)
(NP (PRP he))
(VP (AUX has) (ADVP (RB always))
(VP (VBN shown)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (PRP he))
(VP (VBZ values)
(NP (PRP$ his) (NN family)) (ADVP (RBR more)) (, ,)
(S (VP (VBG trading)
(NP (PRP$ his) (NN wealth))
(PP (IN for)
(NP (PRP$ their) (NN safety)))
(PRN (-LRB- -LRB-)
(SBAR (IN although)
(S (NP (PRP he))
(VP (VBZ manages)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB get)
(NP (PRP it)) (PRT (RP back))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (DT the) (NN end)))
(-RRB- -RRB-)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
In recent weeks, John McCain has shown that he is willing to go into the gutter to win this election.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (PP (IN In)
(NP (JJ recent) (NNS weeks)))
(, ,)
(NP (NNP John) (NNP McCain))
(VP (AUX has)
(VP (VBN shown)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (PRP he))
(VP (AUX is)
(ADJP (JJ willing)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB go)
(PP (IN into)
(NP (DT the) (NN gutter)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB win)
(NP (DT this) (NN election))))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
He shows that the editing in Mark’s version of the story takes it beyond the useful idiom common to Jesus’ other parables.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (PRP He))
(VP (VBZ shows)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (NP (DT the) (NN editing))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (NP (NNP Mark) (POS 's)) (NN version))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN story)))
(VP (VBZ takes)
(NP (PRP it))
(PP (IN beyond)
(NP (NP (DT the) (JJ useful) (NN idiom))
(ADJP (JJ common)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NP (NNP Jesus) (POS ')) (JJ other) (NNS parables))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
From his deep Senate experience, he has shown that he understands how the executive and legislative branches can and should work together.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (PP (IN From)
(NP (PRP$ his) (JJ deep) (NNP Senate) (NN experience)))
(, ,)
(NP (PRP he))
(VP (AUX has)
(VP (VBN shown)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (PRP he))
(VP (VBZ understands)
(SBAR (WHADVP (WRB how))
(S (NP (DT the)
(ADJP (JJ executive) (CC and) (JJ legislative)) (NNS branches))
(VP (MD can) (CC and) (MD should)
(VP (VB work) (ADVP (RB together)))))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
He showed that at last he was independent of Gurdjieff and had his own understanding of the spiritual world, based on a radical questioning of all current assumptions.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (PRP He))
(VP (VBD showed)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (PP (IN at)
(NP (JJ last)))
(NP (PRP he))
(VP (VP (AUX was)
(ADJP (JJ independent)
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NNP Gurdjieff)))))
(CC and)
(VP (AUX had)
(NP (NP (PRP$ his) (JJ own) (NN understanding))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (JJ spiritual) (NN world)))
(, ,)
(PP (VBN based)
(PP (IN on)
(NP (NP (DT a) (JJ radical) (VBG questioning))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT all) (JJ current) (NNS assumptions)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
But he has shown that he listens and I though two weeks ago at the Saddleback Forum he did a tremendous job at being straight – forward and he got the attention of social conservatives that he can listen, he can respond.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (CC But)
(S (NP (PRP he))
(VP (AUX has)
(VP (VBN shown)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (PRP he))
(VP (VBZ listens))))
(CC and)
(S (NP (PRP I)) (ADVP (NP (IN though) (CD two) (NNS weeks)) (RB ago))
(PP (IN at)
(NP (DT the) (NNP Saddleback) (NNP Forum)))
(S (NP (PRP he))
(VP (AUX did)
(NP (DT a) (JJ tremendous) (NN job))
(PP (IN at)
(S (VP (VBG being) (ADVP (RB straight)) (: -) (ADVP (RB forward))))
(CC and)
(S (NP (PRP he))
(VP (VBD got)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN attention))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (JJ social) (NNS conservatives))))
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (PRP he))
(VP (MD can)
(VP (VB listen) (, ,)
(SBAR (S (NP (PRP he))
(VP (MD can)
(VP (VB respond)))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
In his above – mentioned account, he introduced the bra – ket notation, together with an abstract formulation in terms of the Hilbert space used in functional analysis; he showed that Schrdinger’s and Heisenberg’s approaches were two different representations of the same theory and found a third, most general one, which represented the dynamics of the system.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (PP (IN In)
(NP (NP (PRP$ his) (JJ above)) (: -)
(NP (VBN mentioned) (NN account))))
(, ,)
(NP (PRP he))
(VP (VBD introduced)
(NP (DT the) (NN bra))))
(: -)
(S (NP (NN ket) (NN notation)) (, ,) (ADVP (RB together)
(PP (IN with)
(NP (NP (DT an) (JJ abstract) (NN formulation))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (NNS terms))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Hilbert) (NN space))
(VP (VBN used)
(PP (IN in)
(NP (JJ functional) (NN analysis)))
(: ;)
(S (NP (PRP he))
(VP (VP (VBD showed)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (NP (NP (NNP Schrdinger) (POS 's)) (CC and)
(NP (NNP Heisenberg) (POS 's)))
(NNS approaches))
(VP (AUX were)
(NP (NP (CD two) (JJ different) (NNS representations))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (JJ same) (NN theory)))))
(CC and)
(VP (VBD found)
(NP (NP (DT a) (JJ third) (, ,)
(ADJP (RBS most) (JJ general)) (NN one)) (, ,)
(SBAR (WHNP (WDT which))
(S (VP (VBD represented)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NNS dynamics))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN system)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Peter about returning to the Senate showed that, though he once claimed to be a shark, Nathan has doubts about his ability to be a successful leader.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NNP Peter))
(PP (IN about)
(S (VP (VBG returning)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (DT the) (NNP Senate)))
(VP (VBD showed)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (, ,)
(SBAR (IN though)
(S (NP (PRP he)) (ADVP (RB once))
(VP (VBD claimed)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (AUX be)
(NP (DT a) (NN shark)))))
(, ,)
(NP (NNP Nathan))
(VP (VBZ has)
(NP (NP (NNS doubts))
(PP (IN about)
(NP (PRP$ his) (NN ability)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (AUX be)
(NP (DT a) (JJ successful) (NN leader)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
He showed that the “Nemo’ ‘of’’ 20,000 Leagues Under The Sea,’ ’ was Polish, in Verne’s original manuscript.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (PRP He))
(VP (VBD showed)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (NP (NP (NP (DT the) ('' ') (: ')
(NP (NNP Nemo) (POS ')) (: '))
(PP (IN of) ('' ')) (POS ')) (CD 20,000) (NNPS Leagues))
(PP (IN Under)
(NP (NP (DT The) (NNP Sea)) (, ,) ('' ') ('' '))))
(VP (AUX was)
(ADJP (JJ Polish)) (, ,)
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (NNP Verne) (POS 's)) (JJ original) (NN manuscript))))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
He shows that the editing in Mark’s version of the story takes it beyond the useful idiom common to Jesus’ other parables.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (PRP He))
(VP (VBZ shows)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (NP (DT the) (NN editing))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (NP (NNP Mark) (POS 's)) (NN version))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN story)))
(VP (VBZ takes)
(NP (PRP it))
(PP (IN beyond)
(NP (NP (DT the) (JJ useful) (NN idiom))
(ADJP (JJ common)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NP (NNP Jesus) (POS ')) (JJ other) (NNS parables))))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
“Daniel Quinn in” Ishmael”, showed that an anthropocentric myth underlies our current view of the world, and a jellyfish would have an equivalent jellyfish centric view.
(Parse)
(S1 (S ('' '')
(S (NP (NP (NNP Daniel) (NNP Quinn))
(PP (IN in) ('' '')
(NP (NNP Ishmael)))
('' '')) (, ,)
(VP (VBD showed)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (DT an) (JJ anthropocentric) (NN myth))
(VP (VBZ underlies)
(NP (NP (PRP$ our) (JJ current) (NN view))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN world)))
(, ,) (CC and)
(S (NP (DT a) (NN jellyfish))
(VP (MD would)
(VP (AUX have)
(NP (DT an) (JJ equivalent) (JJ jellyfish) (JJ centric) (NN view)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Meantime male being was at the Graduate school upon Montreal trendy the 1960s Michael Mills showed that settle in would look on a divertissement respecting a transfer practically 50 milliseconds, flatten nonetheless the laboring man had lone three fingers and a pollex.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (ADVP (RB Meantime))
(NP (JJ male) (NN being))
(VP (AUX was)
(PP (IN at)
(NP (NP (DT the) (JJ Graduate) (NN school))
(PP (IN upon)
(NP (NNP Montreal) (JJ trendy)))))
(NP (NP (DT the) (NNS 1960s))
(SBAR (S (NP (NNP Michael) (NNP Mills))
(VP (VBD showed)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (S (VP (VB settle) (PRT (RP in))))
(VP (MD would)
(VP (VP (VB look)
(PP (IN on)
(NP (NP (DT a) (NN divertissement))
(VP (VBG respecting)
(NP (DT a) (NN transfer))
(NP (RB practically) (CD 50) (NNS milliseconds)))
(, ,)
(VP (VB flatten) (ADVP (RB nonetheless))
(SBAR (S (NP (DT the) (VBG laboring) (NN man))
(VP (AUX had)
(NP (NP (JJ lone) (CD three) (NNS fingers)) (CC and)
(NP (DT a) (NN pollex))))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
He showed that much powerful learning comes from people learning ’with and from others ’, hence many action learning programmes put the ’action learning set’ at the heart of the process.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (PRP He))
(VP (VBD showed)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (ADJP (RB much) (JJ powerful)) (NN learning))
(VP (VBZ comes)
(PP (PP (IN from)
(NP (NP (NNS people))
(VP (VBG learning)
(NP (NN 'with)))))
(CC and)
(PP (IN from)
(S (NP (NNS others) (POS ')) (, ,)
(NP (ADJP (RB hence) (JJ many)) (NN action))
(VP (VBG learning)
(SBAR (S (NP (NNS programmes))
(VP (VBD put)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN 'action) (NN learning))
(VP (VBN set) ('' ')
(PP (IN at)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN heart))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN process)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Receivers: Miles Austin had a really good game last week and Patrick Crayton showed that he is still the consistent possession receiver he was last season.
(Parse)
(S1 (NP (NP (NNS Receivers)) (: :)
(S (S (NP (NNP Miles) (NNP Austin))
(VP (AUX had)
(NP (DT a)
(ADJP (RB really) (JJ good)) (NN game))
(NP (JJ last) (NN week))))
(CC and)
(S (NP (NNP Patrick) (NNP Crayton))
(VP (VBD showed)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (PRP he))
(VP (AUX is) (ADVP (RB still))
(NP (NP (DT the) (JJ consistent) (NN possession) (NN receiver))
(SBAR (S (NP (PRP he))
(VP (AUX was)
(NP (JJ last) (NN season)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
John McCain is showing once again that he is willing to reach out to Democrats and independents, something Barack Obama has failed to demonstrate so far.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NNP John) (NNP McCain))
(VP (AUX is)
(VP (VBG showing) (ADVP (RB once) (RB again))
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (PRP he))
(VP (AUX is)
(ADJP (JJ willing)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB reach) (PRT (RP out))
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NNS Democrats) (CC and) (NNS independents))))
(, ,)
(NP (NP (NN something))
(SBAR (S (NP (NNP Barack) (NNP Obama))
(VP (AUX has)
(VP (VBN failed)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB demonstrate) (ADVP (RB so) (RB far)))
(. .)))
And 8,280 more sentences.