In the British National Corpus:
As regards Editing for Industry, I am satisfied the management structure and the people involved ensure that it is far and above board – I would not wish to be associated with anything that damaged my reputation or that of the Association.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (SBAR (IN As)
(S (VP (VBZ regards)
(NP (NNP Editing))
(PP (IN for)
(NP (NNP Industry)))
(, ,)
(NP (PRP I))
(VP (AUX am)
(VP (VBN satisfied)
(S (NP (NP (DT the) (NN management) (NN structure)) (CC and)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NNS people))
(VP (VBN involved))))
(VP (VB ensure)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (S (NP (PRP it))
(VP (AUX is) (UCP (ADVP (RB far)) (CC and)
(PP (IN above)
(NP (NN board)))
(: --)
(S (NP (PRP I)) (MD would) (RB not)
(VP (VBP wish)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (AUX be)
(VP (VBN associated)
(PP (IN with)
(NP (NP (NN anything))
(SBAR (WHNP (WDT that))
(S (VP (VBD damaged)
(NP (NP (PRP$ my) (NN reputation)) (CC or)
(NP (NP (DT that))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NNP Association))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
I got big hugs and kisses on the forehead for that What thing would you like to accomplish late in your life? having a large family of my own Do you get annoyed by coming in second place? nope unless there were only 2 people involved then that still makes you the loser :) Have you ever entered a contest of skill, knowing you were of much higher skill than all the other competitors? yes but only because I was challenged to do it by the other competitors…
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (PRP I))
(VP (VBD got)
(NP (JJ big) (NNS hugs) (CC and) (NNS kisses))
(PP (IN on)
(NP (DT the) (NN forehead)))
(PP (IN for)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (FRAG (SBARQ (WHNP (WP What) (NN thing)) (SQ (MD would)
(NP (PRP you))
(VP (VB like)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB accomplish) (ADVP (RB late)
(PP (IN in)
(NP (PRP$ your) (NN life)))))
(. ?)
(S (VP (AUXG having)
(S (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ large) (NN family))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (PRP$ my) (JJ own))))
(VP (VBP Do)
(SBAR (S (NP (PRP you))
(VP (VBP get)
(VP (VBN annoyed)
(PP (IN by)
(S (VP (VBG coming)
(PP (IN in)
(NP (JJ second) (NN place)))
(. ?)) (INTJ (UH nope))
(SBAR (IN unless)
(S (NP (EX there))
(VP (AUX were)
(NP (NP (QP (RB only) (CD 2)) (NNS people))
(VP (VBN involved) (ADVP (RB then))
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (ADVP (RB still))
(VP (VBZ makes)
(S (NP (PRP you))
(NP (DT the) (NN loser)))
(: :) (-RRB- -RRB-)
(VP (AUX Have) (ADVP (PRP you) (RB ever))
(VP (VBN entered)
(NP (NP (DT a) (NN contest))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NN skill))))
(, ,)
(S (VP (VBG knowing)
(SBAR (S (NP (PRP you))
(VP (AUX were)
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (ADJP (RB much) (JJR higher)) (NN skill))
(PP (IN than)
(NP (PDT all) (DT the) (JJ other) (NNS competitors)))
(. ?))))
(SBAR (ADVP (RB yes) (CC but) (RB only)) (IN because)
(S (NP (PRP I))
(VP (AUX was)
(VP (VBN challenged)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (AUX do)
(NP (PRP it))
(PP (IN by)
(NP (DT the) (JJ other) (NNS competitors) (NNS ..)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
I don’t think Lakeland is the place God would want to show up – or the people involved are too american or too pretty or too… well, anything really… it’s humility that will cause my head and heart to bow in submission to God and let Him use anything he wants to expand the Kingdom on earth…
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (NP (PRP I))
(VP (AUX do) (RB n't)
(VP (VB think)
(SBAR (S (NP (NNP Lakeland))
(VP (AUX is)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN place))
(SBAR (S (NP (NNP God))
(VP (MD would)
(VP (VB want)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB show) (PRT (RP up))))
(: -)
(S (S (S (CC or)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NNS people))
(VP (VBN involved)))
(VP (AUX are)
(ADJP (ADJP (RB too) (JJ american)) (CC or)
(ADJP (RB too) (JJ pretty)) (CC or)
(ADJP (RB too) (JJ ..)))))
(. .) (INTJ (UH well)) (, ,)
(NP (NN anything)) (ADVP (RB really))
(VP (VBN ..)) (. .))
(NP (PRP it))
(VP (AUX 's)
(NP (NP (NN humility))
(SBAR (WHNP (WDT that))
(S (VP (MD will)
(VP (VB cause)
(NP (PRP$ my) (NN head) (CC and) (NN heart))
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VP (VB bow)
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (NN submission))
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NNP God)))
(CC and)
(VP (VB let)
(S (NP (PRP Him))
(VP (VB use)
(NP (NP (NN anything))
(SBAR (S (NP (PRP he))
(VP (VBZ wants)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB expand)
(NP (DT the) (NN Kingdom))
(PP (IN on)
(NP (NN earth) (NNS ..)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Death: it’s not that easy. – Saw III tagline. the film is a dedication to the previous producer, Gregg Hoffman (1963 – 2005), whom died shortly after the announcement of Saw III. this version is way Gory (!) compared to the previous 2, definitely Not a recommendation for the fainthearted. the connections between the people involved, which its big picture is finally revealed at the end of the film, is the biggest attraction of the film. emotions.. are what make us vulnerable.. gorier n more believing scenes..
(Parse)
(S1 (FRAG (NP (NN Death)) (: :)
(S (NP (PRP it))
(VP (AUX 's) (RB not)
(PP (IN that)
(NP (JJ easy)))))
(. .) (: -)
(VP (VBD Saw)
(NP (NNP III) (NN tagline)))
(. .)
(S (NP (DT the) (NN film))
(VP (AUX is)
(NP (NP (DT a) (NN dedication))
(PP (TO to)
(NP (DT the) (JJ previous) (NN producer)))
(, ,)
(NP (NNP Gregg) (NNP Hoffman)) (-LRB- -LRB-)
(NP (CD 1963)) (: -)
(NP (CD 2005)) (-RRB- -RRB-) (, ,) (FRAG (SBAR (WHNP (WP whom))
(S (VP (VBD died) (ADVP (RB shortly))
(PP (IN after)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN announcement))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NN Saw)
(SBAR (S (NP (NP (NP (NNP III.))
(SBAR (S (NP (DT this) (NN version))
(VP (AUX is)
(ADJP (RB way) (JJ Gory)))
(-LRB- -LRB-) (. !) (-RRB- -RRB-))
(VP (VBN compared)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (DT the) (JJ previous) (CD 2))))
(, ,) (ADVP (RB definitely) (RB Not))
(NP (NP (DT a) (NN recommendation))
(PP (IN for)
(NP (DT the) (NN fainthearted))))
(. .)
(NP (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS connections))
(PP (IN between)
(S (NP (DT the) (NNS people))
(VP (VBN involved)
(S (, ,)
(SBAR (WHNP (WDT which))
(S (NP (PRP$ its) (JJ big) (NN picture))
(VP (AUX is)
(VP (ADVP (RB finally)) (VBN revealed)
(PP (IN at)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN end))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN film)))
(, ,)
(VP (AUX is)
(NP (NP (DT the) (JJS biggest) (NN attraction))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN film)))))
(. .)))
(NNS emotions)) (. .) (. .)
(VP (AUX are)
(SBAR (WHNP (WP what))
(S (VP (VBP make)
(S (NP (PRP us))
(ADJP (JJ vulnerable))))
(. .) (. .)
(S (NP (NN gorier) (NNP n))
(VP (ADVP (RBR more)) (VBG believing)
(NP (NNS scenes))))
(. .)) (. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Allysa Carberry: Hi Jim: So how bad is it, I mean, Mike Williams says how many people involved.. in your experience have left the whole area because of the new law?
(Parse)
(S1 (FRAG (NP (NNP Allysa) (NNP Carberry) (: :) (NNP Hi) (NNP Jim)) (: :)
(S (S (RB So)
(SBAR (WHNP (WRB how) (JJ bad))
(S (VP (AUX is)
(NP (PRP it)))))
(, ,)
(NP (PRP I))
(VP (VBP mean)))
(, ,)
(NP (NNP Mike) (NNP Williams))
(VP (VBZ says)
(SBAR (WHADVP (WRB how))
(S (NP (JJ many) (NNS people))
(VP (VBN involved)))))
(. .)) (. .)
(SBAR (IN in)
(S (NP (PRP$ your) (NN experience))
(VP (AUX have)
(VP (VBN left)
(NP (DT the) (JJ whole) (NN area))
(PP (IN because) (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (JJ new) (NN law))))
(. ?)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
In early September, a jury hearing a case in which thousands of dollars of damage had been perpetrated against a coal – fired power station decided that the six people involved had a’ ’ lawful excuse’ ’ to vandalize the Kingsnorth power station in Kent because global warming posed an even greater threat and the plant was contributing to it.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (PP (IN In)
(NP (JJ early) (NNP September)))
(, ,)
(S (NP (NP (DT a) (NN jury))
(VP (VBG hearing)
(NP (NP (DT a) (NN case))
(SBAR (WHPP (IN in) (WHNP (WDT which)))
(S (NP (NP (NNS thousands))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (NNS dollars))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NN damage)))
(VP (AUX had)
(VP (AUX been)
(VP (VBN perpetrated)
(PP (IN against)
(NP (NP (DT a) (NN coal)) (: -)
(S (VP (VBD fired)
(SBAR (S (NP (NP (NN power) (NN station))
(VP (VBN decided)
(PP (IN that)
(NP (NP (DT the) (CD six) (NNS people))
(VP (VBN involved)))
(VP (AUX had)
(NP (DT a))))
(: ') ('' ')
(NP (JJ lawful) (NN excuse) (POS ')) ('' ')
(VP (TO to)
(VP (VB vandalize)
(NP (DT the) (NNP Kingsnorth) (NN power) (NN station))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NNP Kent)))
(PP (IN because)
(NP (JJ global) (NN warming)))
(VP (VBD posed)
(NP (DT an)
(ADJP (RB even) (JJR greater)) (NN threat))))
(CC and)
(S (NP (DT the) (NN plant))
(VP (AUX was)
(VP (VBG contributing)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (PRP it)))
(. .)))
In the British National Corpus:
There is no mention of the other two people involved or whether or not they were convicted, an Tyler’s Heath is also an enigma, as there is no record of any such place in this part of Reading.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (NP (EX There))
(VP (AUX is)
(NP (NP (DT no) (NN mention))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (DT the) (JJ other) (CD two) (NNS people))
(VP (VBN involved))))
(CC or)
(S (SBAR (IN whether) (CC or) (RB not)
(S (NP (PRP they))
(VP (AUX were)
(VP (VBN convicted)))))
(, ,)
(NP (DT an)
(NP (NNP Tyler) (POS 's)) (NNP Heath))
(VP (AUX is) (ADVP (RB also))
(NP (DT an) (NN enigma)) (, ,)
(SBAR (IN as)
(S (NP (EX there))
(VP (AUX is)
(NP (NP (DT no) (NN record))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (DT any) (JJ such) (NN place))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (DT this) (NN part))
(PP (IN of)
(S (VP (VBG Reading)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
I just told Benjamin off because, here we go again, about twice a year when I’m trying to organise or plan anything, and I get jostled into all of these little, obscure obligations, whether it has anything to do with what I’d like to do or it’s mostly what other people are trying to involve me in, suddenly allllll the other people involved just sort of drop off the contact map, and then voila, appears Benjamin to say “I’m arriving here and then’ ’ and he never does it.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (PRP I)) (ADVP (RB just))
(VP (VBD told)
(NP (NNP Benjamin)) (ADVP (RB off))
(SBAR (IN because) (, ,)
(S (ADVP (RB here))
(NP (PRP we))
(VP (VBP go) (ADVP (RB again)) (, ,)
(PP (IN about)
(NP (NP (RB twice) (DT a) (NN year))
(SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when))
(S (S (NP (PRP I))
(VP (AUX 'm)
(VP (VBG trying)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NN organise) (CC or) (NN plan) (NN anything)))
(, ,) (CC and)
(S (NP (PRP I))
(VP (VBP get)
(VP (VBN jostled)
(PP (IN into)
(NP (NP (DT all))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT these) (JJ little) (, ,) (JJ obscure) (NNS obligations)))))
(, ,)
(SBAR (IN whether)
(S (NP (PRP it))
(VP (AUX has)
(NP (NP (NN anything))
(SBAR (S (VP (TO to)
(VP (AUX do)
(PP (IN with)
(SBAR (WHNP (WP what))
(S (NP (PRP I))
(VP (MD 'd)
(VP (VB like)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (AUX do)
(S (CC or)
(S (NP (PRP it))
(VP (AUX 's) (ADVP (RB mostly))
(SBAR (WHNP (WP what))
(S (NP (JJ other) (NNS people))
(VP (AUX are)
(VP (VBG trying)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB involve)
(NP (PRP me))
(SBAR (IN in)
(S (, ,)
(S (ADVP (RB suddenly))
(VP (VB allllll)
(S (NP (DT the) (JJ other) (NNS people))
(VP (VBN involved)
(NP (NP (RB just) (NN sort))
(PP (IN of)
(S (VP (VP (VB drop) (PRT (RP off))
(NP (DT the) (NN contact) (NN map)))
(, ,) (CC and) (RB then)
(VP (VBZ voila))))
(, ,)
(VP (VBZ appears)
(S (NP (NNP Benjamin))
(VP (TO to)
(VP (VB say))))
('' ') ('' ')
(NP (PRP I))
(VP (AUX 'm)
(VP (VBG arriving) (ADVP (RB here) (CC and) (RB then))))
('' ') ('' ') (CC and)
(S (NP (PRP he)) (ADVP (RB never))
(VP (AUX does)
(NP (PRP it)))))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
In some settings, e. g. the hospital ward, the patient – physician relationship is much more complex, and many other people are involved when somebody is ill: relatives, neighbors, rescue specialists, nurses, technical personnel, social workers and others.
(Parse)
(S1 (FRAG (PP (IN In)
(NP (DT some) (NNS settings)))
(, ,)
(NP (NNP e)) (. .)
(NP (NNP g)) (. .)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN hospital) (NN ward)) (, ,)
(NP (DT the) (NN patient)))
(: -)
(S (S (NP (NN physician) (NN relationship))
(VP (AUX is)
(ADJP (RB much) (RBR more) (JJ complex))))
(, ,) (CC and)
(S (NP (JJ many) (JJ other) (NNS people))
(VP (AUX are)
(VP (VBN involved)
(SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when))
(S (NP (NN somebody))
(VP (AUX is)
(ADJP (JJ ill)))
(: :)
(NP (NP (NNS relatives)) (, ,)
(NP (NNS neighbors)) (, ,)
(NP (NN rescue) (NNS specialists)) (, ,)
(NP (NNS nurses)) (, ,)
(NP (JJ technical) (NNS personnel)) (, ,)
(NP (JJ social) (NNS workers)) (CC and)
(NP (NNS others)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Rigid, brittle relationships don’t respond well to strain, often failing under the pressures of the people and products involved: control, self-determination, change, etc.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (JJ Rigid) (, ,) (JJ brittle) (NNS relationships))
(VP (AUX do) (RB n't)
(VP (VB respond) (ADVP (RB well))
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NN strain)))
(, ,)
(S (ADVP (RB often))
(VP (VBG failing)
(PP (IN under)
(NP (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS pressures))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NNS people) (CC and) (NNS products))
(VP (VBN involved)))))
(: :)
(NP (NN control)) (, ,)
(NP (NN self-determination)) (, ,)
(NP (NN change)) (, ,) (FW etc))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
First up the Birmingham Opera Company website and the Birmingham Opera Design Brains Trust blog which has profiles of the people involved and sneak previews from July when rehearsals were going on and the building was being prepared.
(Parse)
(S1 (FRAG (ADVP (RB First) (RB up))
(NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Birmingham) (NNP Opera) (NN Company) (NN website)) (CC and)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Birmingham) (NNP Opera) (NNP Design) (NNS Brains) (NNP Trust) (NN blog))
(SBAR (WHNP (WDT which))
(S (VP (VP (AUX has)
(NP (NP (NNS profiles))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NNS people))
(VP (VBN involved)))
(CC and)
(VP (VBP sneak)
(NP (NP (NNS previews))
(PP (IN from)
(NP (NNP July))))
(SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when))
(S (S (NP (NNS rehearsals))
(VP (AUX were)
(VP (VBG going) (PRT (RP on)))))
(CC and)
(S (NP (DT the) (NN building))
(VP (AUX was)
(VP (AUXG being)
(VP (VBN prepared))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
It would take decisions from the people most directly involved and put them in the hands of bureaucrats in the social welfare agencies.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (PRP It))
(VP (MD would)
(VP (VP (VB take)
(NP (NNS decisions))
(PP (IN from)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NNS people))
(VP (ADVP (RBS most) (RB directly)) (VBN involved)))))
(CC and)
(VP (VB put)
(NP (PRP them))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NNS hands))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (NNS bureaucrats))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (DT the) (JJ social) (NN welfare) (NNS agencies))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
If so we write articles about them and the people involved.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (ADVP (IN If) (RB so))
(NP (PRP we))
(VP (VBP write)
(NP (NP (NNS articles))
(PP (IN about)
(NP (NP (PRP them)) (CC and)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NNS people))
(VP (VBN involved))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
The company will be focused on Rails development and we have some fantastic people involved – I’m really excited.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (NP (DT The) (NN company))
(VP (MD will)
(VP (AUX be)
(VP (VBN focused)
(PP (IN on)
(NP (NNS Rails) (NN development))))
(CC and)
(S (NP (PRP we))
(VP (AUX have)
(NP (NP (DT some) (JJ fantastic) (NNS people))
(VP (VBN involved)))))
(: -)
(S (NP (PRP I))
(VP (AUX 'm)
(ADJP (RB really) (JJ excited))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Dropping your kids off at a new school midweek during the fourth week of a marking period might not seem like a bad idea, but you just don’t know how much havoc that causes to all people involved, your kid included.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (S (VP (VBG Dropping)
(NP (PRP$ your) (NNS kids)) (PRT (RP off))
(PP (IN at)
(NP (NP (DT a) (JJ new) (NN school) (JJ midweek))
(PP (IN during)
(NP (NP (DT the) (JJ fourth) (NN week))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT a) (VBG marking) (NN period)))
(VP (MD might) (RB not)
(VP (VB seem)
(PP (IN like)
(NP (DT a) (JJ bad) (NN idea)))
(, ,) (CC but)
(S (NP (PRP you)) (ADVP (RB just))
(VP (AUX do) (RB n't)
(VP (VB know)
(SBAR (WHADVP (WRB how) (JJ much) (NN havoc))
(S (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that))
(S (VP (VBZ causes)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NP (DT all) (NNS people))
(VP (VBN involved))))
(, ,)
(NP (PRP$ your) (NN kid))
(VP (VBN included))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Lotsa people involved too, I bet.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (CD Lotsa) (NNS people))
(VP (VBN involved)
(S (ADVP (RB too)) (, ,)
(NP (PRP I))
(VP (VBP bet))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Mister Bay claims to not know who initially planned the attack, but he does know there are several people involved.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (NP (NN Mister) (NNP Bay))
(VP (VBZ claims)
(S (VP (TO to) (RB not)
(VP (VB know)
(SBAR (WHNP (WP who))
(S (ADVP (RB initially))
(VP (VBD planned)
(NP (DT the) (NN attack))))
(, ,) (CC but)
(S (NP (PRP he))
(VP (AUX does)
(VP (VB know)
(SBAR (S (NP (EX there))
(VP (AUX are)
(NP (NP (JJ several) (NNS people))
(VP (VBN involved)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
“The audience embraces it because they relate to the people involved, who they care about,’ ’ she said, allowing viewers to’ ’ surpass personal biases.”
(Parse)
(S1 (S ('' ') (: ')
(NP (DT The) (NN audience))
(VP (VBZ embraces)
(NP (PRP it))
(SBAR (IN because)
(S (NP (PRP they))
(VP (VBP relate)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NNS people))
(VP (VBN involved)) (, ,)
(SBAR (WHNP (WP who))
(S (NP (PRP they))
(VP (VBP care)
(PP (IN about)) (PRN (, ,) ('' ') ('' ')
(S (NP (PRP she))
(VP (VBD said) (, ,)
(S (VP (VBG allowing)
(S (NP (NNS viewers))
(VP (TO to) ('' ') ('' ')
(VP (VB surpass)
(NP (JJ personal) (NNS biases))))
(. .) ('' ') ('' ')))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
When two people are involved, second means last and I don’t do last.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB When))
(S (NP (CD two) (NNS people))
(VP (AUX are)
(VP (VBN involved)))))
(, ,)
(S (ADVP (RB second))
(VP (VBZ means) (ADVP (RB last))))
(CC and)
(S (NP (PRP I))
(VP (AUX do) (RB n't)
(VP (AUX do)
(ADJP (JJ last)))))
(. .)))
And 7,634 more sentences.
NB: Do not link to this page – the URL for this factoid will change every time the available knowledge base is updated.