Learned by Reading
In Wikipedia:
Supporters of Holsinger’s nomination defended the paper as a review of the relevant medical literature at that time.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NP (NNS Supporters))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (NNP Holsinger) (POS 's)) (NN nomination))))
(VP (VBD defended)
(NP (DT the) (NN paper))
(PP (IN as)
(NP (NP (DT a) (NN review))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (JJ relevant) (JJ medical) (NN literature)))))
(PP (IN at)
(NP (DT that) (NN time))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
In fact, reviews of the medical literature reveal that only one in seven new drugs is superior to existing medications.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (PP (IN In)
(NP (NN fact)))
(, ,)
(NP (NP (NNS reviews))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (JJ medical) (NN literature))))
(VP (VBP reveal)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (QP (RB only) (CD one) (IN in) (CD seven)) (JJ new) (NNS drugs))
(VP (AUX is)
(ADJP (JJ superior)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (VBG existing) (NNS medications)))))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
A review of the literature found that there is no association between alcohol use and bile duct cancer.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NP (DT A) (NN review))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN literature))))
(VP (VBD found)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (EX there))
(VP (AUX is)
(NP (NP (DT no) (NN association))
(PP (IN between)
(NP (NP (NN alcohol) (NN use)) (CC and)
(NP (JJ bile) (JJ duct) (NN cancer)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
METHODS: The background research phase encompassed a thorough review of the literature, affinity diagramming, contextual inquiry, and semistructured interviews.
(Parse)
(S1 (NP (NNS METHODS) (: :)
(NP (NP (DT The) (NN background) (NN research) (NN phase))
(VP (VBD encompassed)
(NP (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ thorough) (NN review))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN literature))))
(, ,)
(NP (NN affinity) (VBG diagramming)) (, ,)
(NP (JJ contextual) (NN inquiry)) (, ,) (CC and)
(NP (JJ semistructured) (NNS interviews)))))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
An extensive review of the literature by Melton “et al.
(Parse)
(S1 (NP (NP (NP (DT An) (JJ extensive) (NN review))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN literature))))
(PP (IN by)
(NP (NNP Melton)))
('' '')
(ADJP (FW et) (FW al.))))
In Wikipedia:
Reviews of the literature covering clinical studies of silymarin vary in their conclusions.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NP (NNS Reviews))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN literature))
(VP (VBG covering)
(NP (NP (JJ clinical) (NNS studies))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NN silymarin)))))
(VP (VBP vary) (PRT (RP in))
(NP (PRP$ their) (NNS conclusions)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Finally, we conducted a review of the literature to determine the sample sizes typically used when parameterizing matrix models used to study plant demography.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (ADVP (RB Finally)) (, ,)
(NP (PRP we))
(VP (VBD conducted)
(NP (NP (DT a) (NN review))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN literature)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB determine)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN sample) (NNS sizes))
(VP (ADVP (RB typically)) (VBN used)
(SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when))
(S (NP (JJ parameterizing) (NNP matrix) (NNS models))
(VP (VBD used)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB study)
(NP (NN plant) (NN demography)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
That’s not to say that meta – analyses of the literature aren’t often useful, just as systematic reviews of the literature, are.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (NP (DT That))
(VP (AUX 's) (RB not)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB say)
(NP (DT that) (NNP meta))))
(: -)
(S (NP (NP (NNS analyses))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN literature))))
(VP (AUX are) (RB n't) (ADVP (RB often))
(ADJP (JJ useful)) (, ,)
(SBAR (RB just) (IN as)
(S (NP (NP (JJ systematic) (NNS reviews))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN literature))))
(, ,)
(VP (AUX are)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
this website also spoke with Dr. John Shea a Toronto – based physician who has done extensive reviews of the literature on the subject and who has also concluded that the scientific arguments against considering brain death as true death have never been effectively countered.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (DT this) (NN website)) (ADVP (RB also))
(VP (VBD spoke)
(PP (IN with)
(NP (NP (NNP Dr.) (NNP John) (NNP Shea)
(NP (DT a) (NNP Toronto)))
(: -)
(NP (NP (VBN based) (NN physician))
(SBAR (SBAR (WHNP (WP who))
(S (VP (AUX has)
(VP (AUX done)
(NP (NP (JJ extensive) (NNS reviews))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN literature))))
(PP (IN on)
(NP (DT the) (NN subject))))
(CC and)
(SBAR (WHNP (WP who))
(S (VP (AUX has) (ADVP (RB also))
(VP (VBN concluded)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ scientific) (NNS arguments))
(PP (IN against)
(S (VP (VBG considering)
(NP (NN brain) (NN death))
(PP (IN as)
(NP (JJ true) (NN death))))
(VP (AUX have) (ADVP (RB never))
(VP (AUX been)
(VP (ADVP (RB effectively)) (VBN countered)))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
Subsequent reviews of the literature and available data could find no evidence to support this endangered status.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NP (NP (JJ Subsequent) (NNS reviews))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN literature))))
(CC and)
(NP (JJ available) (NNS data)))
(VP (MD could)
(VP (VB find)
(NP (DT no) (NN evidence)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB support)
(NP (DT this) (VBN endangered) (NN status)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
As Mapping America shows, the practice of religion is integral to superior outcomes in most dimensions of life, and medicine is no exception as reviews of the literature make clear.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (PP (IN As)
(NP (NN Mapping) (NNP America) (NNS shows)))
(, ,)
(S (NP (NP (DT the) (NN practice))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NN religion))))
(VP (AUX is)
(ADJP (JJ integral)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (JJ superior) (NNS outcomes))))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (JJS most) (NNS dimensions))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NN life))))
(, ,) (CC and)
(S (NP (NN medicine))
(VP (AUX is)
(NP (DT no) (NN exception)
(SBAR (IN as)
(S (NP (NP (NNS reviews))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN literature))))
(VP (VBP make)
(S (ADJP (JJ clear)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
METHODS: The background research phase encompassed a thorough review of the literature, affinity diagramming, contextual inquiry, and semistructured interviews.
(Parse)
(S1 (NP (NNS METHODS) (: :)
(NP (NP (DT The) (NN background) (NN research) (NN phase))
(VP (VBD encompassed)
(NP (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ thorough) (NN review))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN literature))))
(, ,)
(NP (NN affinity) (VBG diagramming)) (, ,)
(NP (JJ contextual) (NN inquiry)) (, ,) (CC and)
(NP (JJ semistructured) (NNS interviews)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
“Their petition confirms what international surveys of climate scientists and recent reviews of the literature show: Most scientists do not believe most or all of the modern warming is manmade, that future climate changes can be predicted with accuracy, or that future warming would be catastrophic.
(Parse)
(S1 (S ('' ') ('' ')
(NP (PRP$ Their) (NN petition))
(VP (VBZ confirms)
(SBAR (WHNP (WP what))
(S (NP (NP (NP (JJ international) (NNS surveys))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NN climate) (NNS scientists))))
(CC and)
(NP (NP (JJ recent) (NNS reviews))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN literature)))))
(VP (VBP show)
(SBAR (S (NP (: :) (JJS Most) (NNS scientists))
(VP (AUX do) (RB not)
(VP (VB believe)
(SBAR (S (NP (NP (JJS most)) (CC or)
(NP (NP (DT all))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (JJ modern) (NN warming)))))
(VP (AUX is)
(ADJP (JJ manmade)) (, ,)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (JJ future) (NN climate) (NNS changes))
(VP (MD can)
(VP (AUX be)
(VP (VBN predicted)
(PP (IN with)
(NP (NP (NN accuracy)) (, ,) (CC or)
(NP (DT that) (JJ future) (NN warming))))
(SBAR (S (VP (MD would)
(VP (AUX be)
(ADJP (JJ catastrophic))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Music is not mentioned in reviews of the literature on suicide (Lester 1983; Stack 1982, 1990b); instead, the impact of art on suicide has been largely restricted to analyses of television movies and soap operas (for a review, see Stack 1990b).
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (NP (NN Music))
(VP (AUX is) (RB not)
(VP (VBN mentioned)
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (NNS reviews))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN literature))
(PP (IN on)
(NP (NN suicide)))
(PRN (-LRB- -LRB-)
(NP (NNP Lester) (CD 1983)) (: ;)
(NP (VB Stack) (CD 1982) (, ,) (CD 1990b)) (-RRB- -RRB-)))
(: ;)
(S (ADVP (RB instead)) (, ,)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN impact))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NN art)))
(PP (IN on)
(NP (NN suicide))))
(VP (AUX has)
(VP (AUX been) (ADVP (RB largely))
(VP (VBN restricted)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NP (NNS analyses))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (NN television) (NNS movies)) (CC and)
(NP (NN soap) (NNS operas))))
(PRN (-LRB- -LRB-)
(S (PP (IN for)
(NP (DT a) (NN review)))
(, ,)
(VP (VB see)
(NP (VB Stack) (CD 1990b))))
(-RRB- -RRB-)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
A meta – analysis performs an original analysis drawing together the data and / or findings of multiple previous studies, identified by a comprehensive review of the literature.
(Parse)
(S1 (FRAG (NP (DT A) (NNP meta)) (: -)
(S (NP (NN analysis))
(VP (VBZ performs)
(NP (NP (DT an) (JJ original) (NN analysis))
(VP (VBG drawing) (PRT (RP together))
(NP (NP (DT the) (NNS data) (CC and) (NNS /) (CC or) (NNS findings))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (JJ multiple) (JJ previous) (NNS studies)))
(, ,)
(VP (VBN identified)
(PP (IN by)
(NP (NP (DT a) (JJ comprehensive) (NN review))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN literature)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
That’s not to say that they aren’t often useful, just as systematic reviews of the literature, are.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (DT That))
(VP (AUX 's) (RB not)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB say)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (PRP they))
(VP (VBP are) (RB n't)
(ADJP (RB often) (JJ useful)) (, ,)
(SBAR (RB just) (IN as)
(S (NP (NP (JJ systematic) (NNS reviews))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN literature))))
(, ,)
(VP (AUX are)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
My knee doesn’t hurt so much as it feels like it’s thinking about hurting. * sigh * I found a review of the literature that seems to suggest that the reason physical therapy doesn’t seem to be working for me is that it simply may not work.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (NP (PRP$ My) (NN knee))
(VP (AUX does) (RB n't)
(VP (VB hurt) (ADVP (ADVP (RB so) (RB much))
(SBAR (IN as)
(S (NP (PRP it))
(VP (VBZ feels)
(SBAR (IN like)
(S (NP (PRP it))
(VP (AUX 's)
(VP (VBG thinking)
(PP (IN about)
(NP (VBG hurting)))))
(. .)
(NP (NNP *) (NN sigh) (NNP *) (NNP I))
(VP (VBD found)
(NP (NP (DT a) (NN review))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN literature))
(SBAR (WHNP (WDT that))
(S (VP (VBZ seems)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB suggest)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (NP (DT the) (NN reason))
(SBAR (S (NP (JJ physical) (NN therapy))
(VP (AUX does) (RB n't)
(VP (VB seem)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (AUX be)
(VP (VBG working)
(PP (IN for)
(NP (PRP me)))
(VP (AUX is)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (PRP it)) (ADVP (RB simply))
(VP (MD may) (RB not)
(VP (VB work)))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
Various reviews of all the scientific literature on the topic performed in 2002 and 2008 could not find any solid scientific evidence that recommended drinking eight glasses of water per day.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NP (JJ Various) (NNS reviews))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (PDT all) (DT the) (JJ scientific) (NN literature))
(PP (IN on)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN topic))
(VP (VBN performed)
(PP (IN in)
(NP (CD 2002) (CC and) (CD 2008)))
(VP (MD could) (RB not)
(VP (VB find)
(NP (DT any) (JJ solid) (JJ scientific) (NN evidence)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (VP (VBN recommended)
(PP (VBG drinking)
(NP (NP (CD eight) (NNS glasses))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NN water)))
(PP (IN per)
(NP (NN day)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Both from my 30 years clinical work as well as frequent reviews of the literature convinces me that at least one major avenue leading to the creation of these kinds of addictions is through a process of masturbatory conditioning.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NP (DT Both))
(PP (IN from)
(NP (NP (NP (PRP$ my) (CD 30) (NNS years)) (JJ clinical) (NN work)) (CONJP (RB as) (RB well) (IN as))
(NP (NP (JJ frequent) (NNS reviews))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN literature))))
(VP (VBZ convinces)
(NP (PRP me))
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (NP (QP (IN at) (JJS least) (CD one)) (JJ major) (NN avenue))
(VP (VBG leading)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN creation))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (DT these) (NNS kinds))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NNS addictions)))
(VP (AUX is)
(PP (IN through)
(NP (NP (DT a) (NN process))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (JJ masturbatory) (NN conditioning)))
(. .)))
And 442 more sentences.