Learned by Reading
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Questions were really interesting.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NNS Questions))
(VP (AUX were)
(ADJP (RB really) (JJ interesting)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Questions about the contractor’s personality may be interesting, and they may even influence how he built the house.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (NP (NP (NNS Questions))
(PP (IN about)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN contractor) (POS 's)) (NN personality))))
(VP (MD may)
(VP (AUX be)
(ADJP (JJ interesting)))))
(, ,) (CC and)
(S (NP (PRP they))
(VP (MD may) (ADVP (RB even))
(VP (VB influence)
(SBAR (WHADVP (WRB how))
(S (NP (PRP he))
(VP (VBD built)
(NP (DT the) (NN house)))))
(. .)))
In the British National Corpus:
The source of the sand raises an interesting question, because it is difficult to see how such amounts could have been accumulated by the wind.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN source))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN sand))))
(VP (VBZ raises)
(NP (DT an) (JJ interesting) (NN question)) (, ,)
(SBAR (IN because)
(S (NP (PRP it))
(VP (AUX is)
(ADJP (JJ difficult)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB see)
(SBAR (WHADVP (WRB how))
(S (NP (JJ such) (NNS amounts))
(VP (MD could)
(VP (AUX have)
(VP (AUX been)
(VP (VBN accumulated)
(PP (IN by)
(NP (DT the) (NN wind)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
His gaze blanked out while searching the answer for that interesting question, just before it ran to more interesting patterns of thought.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (PRP$ His) (VBP gaze))
(VP (VBN blanked) (PRT (RP out))
(SBAR (IN while)
(S (VP (VBG searching)
(NP (DT the) (NN answer))
(PP (IN for)
(NP (DT that) (JJ interesting) (NN question)))
(, ,)
(SBAR (RB just) (IN before)
(S (NP (PRP it))
(VP (VBD ran)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NP (ADJP (RBR more) (JJ interesting)) (NNS patterns))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NN thought)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Today’s question is interesting [and had me laughing out loud when I first read it].
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NP (NNP Today) (POS 's)) (NN question))
(VP (VP (AUX is)
(ADJP (JJ interesting) (JJ -LSB-)))
(CC and)
(VP (AUX had)
(S (NP (PRP me))
(VP (VBG laughing) (ADVP (RB out) (RB loud))
(SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when))
(S (NP (PRP I)) (ADVP (RB first))
(VP (VBD read)
(S (NP (PRP it))
(ADJP (JJ -RSB-))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
I find the question interesting, mainly for its lack of historical perspective.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (PRP I))
(VP (VBP find)
(S (NP (DT the) (NN question))
(ADJP (JJ interesting)))
(, ,)
(PP (ADVP (RB mainly)) (IN for)
(NP (NP (PRP$ its) (NN lack))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (JJ historical) (NN perspective)))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
As official interpreter of Papal pronouncements on questions interesting French Canada, he became very influential, pronouncing opinions on issues such as the Manitoba Schools Question (his first public intervention) and Ontario’s Regulation 17.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (PP (IN As)
(NP (NP (JJ official) (NN interpreter))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (JJ Papal) (NNS pronouncements))
(PP (IN on)
(NP (NP (NNS questions))
(ADJP (JJ interesting)
(NP (NNP French) (NNP Canada)))
(, ,)
(NP (PRP he))
(VP (VBD became)
(ADJP (RB very) (JJ influential)) (, ,)
(S (VP (VBG pronouncing)
(NP (NP (NNS opinions))
(PP (IN on)
(NP (NP (NNS issues))
(PP (JJ such) (IN as)
(NP (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Manitoba) (NNP Schools) (NN Question)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-)
(NP (PRP$ his) (JJ first) (JJ public) (NN intervention)) (-RRB- -RRB-)))
(CC and)
(NP (NP (NNP Ontario) (POS 's)) (NNP Regulation) (CD 17))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Only questions, interesting and not, and answers, right and wrong.
(Parse)
(S1 (NP (NP (JJ Only) (NNS questions)) (, ,)
(ADJP (JJ interesting) (CC and) (RB not)) (, ,) (CC and)
(NP (NP (NNS answers)) (, ,)
(ADJP (JJ right) (CC and) (JJ wrong)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Questions are more interesting than answers for him, perhaps.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NNS Questions))
(VP (AUX are)
(ADJP (ADJP (RBR more) (JJ interesting))
(PP (IN than)
(NP (NP (NNS answers))
(PP (IN for)
(NP (PRP him)))
(, ,) (ADVP (RB perhaps)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
The star thing – if you find a question interesting you can star it, then what you have starred appears to your contacts on the my profile page, if yahoo is not informing contacts of our questions (for whatever reason) if we starred everything as such, its a back door way of informing our contacts of fellow contacts questions, thus holding us a bit more together.
(Parse)
(S1 (FRAG (NP (DT The) (JJ star) (NN thing)) (: -)
(SBAR (IN if)
(S (NP (PRP you))
(VP (VBP find)
(S (NP (DT a) (NN question))
(ADJP (JJ interesting)
(SBAR (S (NP (PRP you))
(VP (MD can)
(VP (VB star)
(NP (PRP it)))))
(, ,) (ADVP (RB then))
(SBAR (WHNP (WP what))
(S (NP (PRP you))
(VP (AUX have)
(VP (VBN starred)
(S (VP (VBZ appears)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (PRP$ your) (NNS contacts)))
(PP (IN on)
(NP (DT the) (JJ my) (JJ profile) (NN page)))))
(, ,)
(SBAR (IN if)
(S (NP (NN yahoo))
(VP (AUX is) (RB not)
(VP (VBG informing)
(NP (NNS contacts))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (PRP$ our) (NNS questions)))
(PRN (-LRB- -LRB-)
(PP (IN for)
(NP (WDT whatever) (NN reason)))
(-RRB- -RRB-))
(SBAR (IN if)
(S (NP (PRP we))
(VP (VBD starred)
(NP (NN everything))
(PP (IN as)
(NP (JJ such)))
(, ,)
(NP (NP (PRP$ its)
(NP (DT a) (JJ back) (NN door)) (NN way))
(PP (IN of)
(S (VP (VBG informing)
(NP (PRP$ our) (NNS contacts))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (JJ fellow) (NNS contacts)))
(NP (NNS questions)) (, ,)
(S (ADVP (RB thus))
(VP (VBG holding)
(NP (PRP us)) (ADVP (NP (DT a) (NN bit)) (RBR more)) (ADVP (RB together))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Another interesting question will be how advanced the defense is, since with 10 returning starters (and Baston who saw a good amount of time), Coach Eberflus has likely installed almost his entire defense with such experience.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (DT Another) (JJ interesting) (NN question))
(VP (MD will)
(VP (VB be)
(SBAR (WHADJP (WRB how) (JJ advanced))
(S (NP (DT the) (NN defense))
(VP (AUX is) (, ,)
(SBAR (IN since)
(S (PP (IN with)
(NP (NP (CD 10) (VBG returning) (NNS starters)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (CC and)
(NP (NP (NNP Baston))
(SBAR (WHNP (WP who))
(S (VP (VBD saw)
(NP (NP (DT a) (JJ good) (NN amount))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NN time)))))
(-RRB- -RRB-))))
(, ,)
(NP (NNP Coach) (NNP Eberflus))
(VP (AUX has) (ADVP (RB likely))
(VP (VBN installed)
(NP (RB almost) (PRP$ his) (JJ entire) (NN defense))
(PP (IN with)
(NP (JJ such) (NN experience)))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
The question of whether these should be called dialects or languages in their own right is particularly interesting in Chinese.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN question))
(PP (IN of)
(SBAR (IN whether)
(S (NP (DT these))
(VP (MD should)
(VP (AUX be)
(VP (VBN called)
(NP (NNS dialects) (CC or) (NNS languages))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (PRP$ their) (JJ own) (NN right))))
(VP (AUX is)
(ADJP (RB particularly) (JJ interesting))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NNP Chinese))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
I find that to be a very interesting question actually, b / c I just really don’t think about it that much…
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (PRP I))
(VP (VBP find)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (S (VP (TO to)
(VP (AUX be)
(NP (DT a)
(ADJP (RB very) (JJ interesting)) (NN question)) (ADVP (RB actually)))))
(, ,)
(NP (NNP b) (NNP /) (NNP c))
(NP (PRP I)) (ADVP (RB just) (RB really))
(VP (AUX do) (RB n't)
(VP (VB think)
(PP (IN about)
(NP (PRP it)))
(NP (DT that) (JJ much) (FW ..))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
A very interesting question at least for me; – ) Drumity
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (DT A)
(ADJP (RB very) (JJ interesting)) (NN question))
(PP (ADVP (IN at) (JJS least)) (IN for)
(NP (PRP me)))
(: ;) (LST (: -)) (-RRB- -RRB-)
(NP (NNP Drumity))))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
The question is interesting enough, but I’ve always thought the point of asking it is…
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (NP (DT The) (NN question))
(VP (AUX is)
(ADJP (JJ interesting) (JJ enough))))
(, ,) (CC but)
(S (NP (PRP I))
(VP (AUX 've) (ADVP (RB always))
(VP (VBD thought)
(NP (DT the) (NN point))
(PP (IN of)
(S (VP (VBG asking)
(SBAR (S (NP (PRP it))
(VP (AUX is)
(ADJP (JJ ..)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
There was a mini interview as well where Jon and Brendon pick questions from a teapot? interesting.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (EX There))
(VP (AUX was)
(NP (DT a) (JJ mini) (NN interview)) (ADVP (RB as) (RB well))
(SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where))
(S (NP (NNP Jon) (CC and) (NNP Brendon))
(VP (VB pick)
(S (NP (NP (NNS questions))
(PP (IN from)
(NP (DT a) (NN teapot)))
(. ?))
(ADJP (JJ interesting))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
The last question is also interesting: Do you think that the following statement is true or false? “Buying a single company stock usually provides a safer return than a stock mutual fund. “True False Do not know I think one financially literate answer to this question is “I don’t have enough information to answer the question. “Clearly the answer they’re fishing for is’ ‘false’ ’, but if you do know something about stocks, you know that over long periods, stocks are relatively safe.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (S (S (NP (DT The) (JJ last) (NN question))
(VP (AUX is)
(ADJP (RB also) (JJ interesting)) (: :) (SQ (NNP Do)
(NP (PRP you))
(VP (VBP think)
(SBAR (S (IN that)
(NP (DT the) (JJ following) (NN statement))
(VP (AUX is)
(ADJP (JJ true) (CC or) (JJ false)))
(. ?) ('' ') ('' ')
(VP (VBG Buying)
(NP (NP (DT a) (JJ single) (NN company) (NN stock))
(SBAR (S (ADVP (RB usually))
(VP (VBZ provides)
(NP (NP (DT a) (JJR safer) (NN return))
(PP (IN than)
(NP (DT a) (NN stock))))
(NP (JJ mutual) (NN fund))))
(. .) ('' ') ('' ')
(ADJP (JJ True) (JJ False))
(S (VP (AUX Do) (RB not)
(VP (VB know)
(S (NP (PRP I))
(VP (VBP think)
(SBAR (S (NP (NP (CD one)
(ADJP (RB financially) (JJ literate)) (NN answer))
(PP (TO to)
(NP (DT this) (NN question))))
(VP (AUX is)))
('' ') ('' ')
(NP (PRP I))
(VP (AUX do) (RB n't)
(VP (AUX have)
(NP (NP (JJ enough) (NN information))
(SBAR (S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB answer)
(NP (DT the) (NN question)))
(. .) ('' ') ('' ') (RB Clearly)
(S (NP (DT the) (NN answer))
(NP (PRP they))
(VP (AUX 're)
(VP (VBG fishing)
(PP (IN for)
(NP (VBZ is)))
('' ') ('' '))
(ADJP (JJ false)) ('' ') ('' ')) (, ,) (CC but)
(S (SBAR (IN if)
(S (NP (PRP you))
(VP (AUX do)
(VP (VB know)
(NP (NN something))
(PP (IN about)
(NP (NNS stocks))))
(, ,)
(NP (PRP you))
(VP (VBP know)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (PP (IN over)
(NP (JJ long) (NNS periods)))
(, ,)
(NP (NNS stocks))
(VP (VBP are)
(ADJP (RB relatively) (JJ safe))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
We found that this was an ethical question that would be interesting and important to media studies students.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (PRP We))
(VP (VBD found)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (DT this))
(VP (AUX was)
(NP (NP (DT an) (JJ ethical) (NN question))
(SBAR (WHNP (WDT that))
(S (VP (MD would)
(VP (AUX be)
(ADJP (JJ interesting) (CC and) (JJ important)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NN media) (NNS studies) (NNS students))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Questions and Answers session was very interesting.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NP (NNS Questions) (CC and) (NNS Answers)) (NN session))
(VP (AUX was)
(ADJP (RB very) (JJ interesting)))
(. .)))
And 4,636 more sentences.