[〈det candidate.n〉 successful.a]
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Rexahn’s actual results may differ materially from the anticipated results and expectations expressed in these forward – looking statements as a result of certain risks and uncertainties, including, Rexahn’s lack of profitability, its auditor’s going concern qualification and the need for additional capital to operate its business to develop its product candidates; the risk that Rexahn’s development efforts relating to its product candidates may not be successful; the possibility of being unable to obtain regulatory approval of Rexahn’s product candidates; the risk that the results of clinical trials may not be completed on time or support Rexahn’s claims; demand for and market acceptance of Rexahn’s drug candidates; Rexahn’s reliance on third party researchers and manufacturers to develop its product candidates; Rexahn’s ability to develop and obtain protection of its intellectual property; and other risk factors set forth from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NP (NNP Rexahn) (POS 's)) (JJ actual) (NNS results))
(VP (MD may)
(VP (VB differ) (ADVP (RB materially))
(PP (IN from)
(NP (NP (DT the) (JJ anticipated) (NNS results)) (CC and)
(NP (NP (NNS expectations))
(VP (VBN expressed)
(PP (IN in)
(NP (DT these) (JJ forward))))
(: -)
(S (VP (VBG looking)
(NP (NNS statements))
(PP (IN as)
(NP (NP (NP (DT a) (NN result))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (JJ certain) (NNS risks) (CC and) (NNS uncertainties))))
(, ,)
(NP (VBG including)) (, ,)
(NP (NP (NP (NNP Rexahn) (POS 's)) (NN lack))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NN profitability))))
(, ,)
(NP (NP (PRP$ its) (NN auditor) (POS 's)) (JJ going) (NN concern) (NN qualification)) (CC and)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN need))
(PP (IN for)
(NP (JJ additional) (NN capital)))
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB operate)
(NP (PRP$ its) (NN business)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB develop)
(NP (NP (PRP$ its) (NN product) (NNS candidates)) (: ;)
(NP (NP (NP (DT the) (NN risk))
(PP (IN that)
(NP (NP (NP (NNP Rexahn) (POS 's)) (NN development) (NNS efforts))
(VP (VBG relating)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (PRP$ its) (NN product)
(SBAR (S (NP (NNS candidates))
(VP (MD may) (RB not)
(VP (AUX be)
(ADJP (JJ successful)))
(: ;)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN possibility))
(PP (IN of)
(S (VP (AUXG being)
(ADJP (JJ unable)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB obtain)
(NP (JJ regulatory) (NN approval))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (NNP Rexahn) (POS 's)) (NN product) (NNS candidates)))
(: ;)
(NP (DT the) (NN risk)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS results))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (JJ clinical) (NNS trials))))
(VP (MD may) (RB not)
(VP (VP (AUX be)
(VP (VBN completed)
(PP (IN on)
(NP (NN time)))))
(CC or)
(VP (VB support)
(NP (NP (NNP Rexahn) (POS 's)) (NNS claims))))
(: ;)
(NP (NP (NN demand))
(PP (IN for)
(NP (CC and)
(NP (NP (NP (NN market) (NN acceptance))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (NNP Rexahn) (POS 's)) (NN drug) (NNS candidates))))
(: ;)
(NP (NP (NP (NNP Rexahn) (POS 's)) (NN reliance))
(PP (IN on)
(NP (NP (JJ third) (NN party) (NNS researchers) (CC and) (NNS manufacturers))
(SBAR (S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB develop)
(NP (PRP$ its) (NN product) (NNS candidates)))
(: ;)
(NP (NP (NNP Rexahn) (POS 's)) (NN ability)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB develop) (CC and) (VB obtain)
(NP (NP (NN protection))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (PRP$ its) (JJ intellectual) (NN property)))))
(: ;) (CC and)
(NP (NP (JJ other) (NN risk) (NNS factors))
(VP (VBN set) (PRT (RP forth))
(PP (IN from)
(NP (NN time))
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NP (NN time))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (PRP$ our) (NNS filings))
(PP (IN with)
(NP (DT the) (NNPS Securities) (CC and) (NNP Exchange) (NNP Commission)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Candidates nominated by convention are rarely successful, but there are exceptions.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (NP (NP (NNS Candidates))
(VP (VBN nominated)
(PP (IN by)
(NP (NN convention)))))
(VP (AUX are) (ADVP (RB rarely))
(ADJP (JJ successful))))
(, ,) (CC but)
(S (NP (EX there))
(VP (AUX are)
(NP (NNS exceptions))))
(. .)))
In Simple Wikipedia:
If the candidate is successful he will have passed the examination.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (SBAR (IN If)
(S (NP (DT the) (NN candidate))
(VP (AUX is)
(ADJP (JJ successful)))))
(NP (PRP he))
(VP (MD will)
(VP (AUX have)
(VP (VBN passed)
(NP (DT the) (NN examination)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Successful candidate will need to possess the ability to work on cross – functional teams and establish good working relationships within the Module Center.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (JJ Successful) (NN candidate))
(VP (MD will)
(VP (AUX need)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB possess)
(NP (DT the) (NN ability)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VP (VB work)
(PP (IN on)
(NP (NN cross)))
(: -)
(NP (JJ functional) (NNS teams)))
(CC and)
(VP (VB establish)
(NP (JJ good) (JJ working) (NNS relationships))))
(PP (IN within)
(NP (DT the) (NNP Module) (NNP Center)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
The successful candidate will have an excellent knowledge base to perform acute episodic care including examinations, assessments, treatments and appropriate referrals.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (DT The) (JJ successful) (NN candidate))
(VP (MD will)
(VP (AUX have)
(NP (DT an) (JJ excellent) (NN knowledge) (NN base))
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB perform)
(NP (JJ acute) (JJ episodic) (NN care))
(PP (VBG including)
(NP (NNS examinations) (, ,) (NNS assessments) (, ,) (NNS treatments) (CC and) (JJ appropriate) (NNS referrals)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
I’ve received a lot of emails over the last several days – some kind, some not – reminding me that the candidate we worked so hard on was not successful.
(Parse)
(S1 (FRAG (S (NP (PRP I))
(VP (AUX 've)
(VP (VBN received)
(NP (NP (DT a) (NN lot))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NNS emails))))
(PP (IN over)
(NP (DT the) (JJ last) (JJ several) (NNS days)))
(: -)
(NP (DT some) (NN kind)) (, ,)
(NP (DT some) (RB not)) (: -)
(S (VP (VBG reminding)
(NP (PRP me))
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (DT the) (NN candidate)
(S (NP (PRP we))
(VP (VBD worked) (ADVP (RB so) (RB hard))
(PP (IN on)))))
(VP (AUX was) (RB not)
(ADJP (JJ successful))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Election results in parts of west Toronto over several decades show Italo – Canadian candidates alone being successful.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NP (NN Election) (NNS results))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (NNS parts))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (JJ west) (NNP Toronto)))
(PP (IN over)
(NP (JJ several) (NNS decades)))
(VP (VBP show)
(S (NP (NNP Italo) (: -) (NNP Canadian) (NNS candidates)) (ADVP (RB alone))
(VP (AUXG being)
(ADJP (JJ successful)))))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
Nevertheless, populist candidates have been more successful in poorer Latin American countries such as Bolivia (under Morales), Ecuador (under Correa) and Nicaragua (under Ortega).
(Parse)
(S1 (S (ADVP (RB Nevertheless)) (, ,)
(NP (JJ populist) (NNS candidates))
(VP (AUX have)
(VP (AUX been)
(ADJP (RBR more) (JJ successful))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (JJR poorer) (NNP Latin) (NNP American) (NNS countries))
(PP (JJ such) (IN as)
(NP (NNP Bolivia)))
(PRN (-LRB- -LRB-)
(PP (IN under)
(NP (NNP Morales)))
(-RRB- -RRB-)) (, ,)
(NP (NP (NP (NNP Ecuador)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-)
(PP (IN under)
(NP (NNP Correa)))
(-RRB- -RRB-)))
(CC and)
(NP (NNP Nicaragua)))
(PRN (-LRB- -LRB-)
(PP (IN under)
(NP (NNP Ortega)))
(-RRB- -RRB-)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Successful candidate will have * high level of troubleshooting skills * high level knowledge of RS – 485 networks or PC Networks * basic knowledge of electrical connections * basic knowledge of Windows software
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (JJ Successful) (NN candidate))
(VP (MD will)
(VP (AUX have)
(NP (NP (NNP *) (JJ high) (NN level))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (NN troubleshooting) (NNS skills) (NNP *) (NN high) (NN level) (NN knowledge))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (NNPS RS)) (: -)
(NP (CD 485) (NNS networks)) (CC or)
(NP (NNP PC) (NNPS Networks) (NNP *))))
(NP (NP (JJ basic) (NN knowledge))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (JJ electrical) (NNS connections))))
(NP (NP (NNP *) (JJ basic) (NN knowledge))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NNS Windows) (NN software))))))))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Clinton, the most successful female Presidential candidate in US history, ended her courageous campaign with an emotional speech, asking her voters to get behind Obama, endorsing his nomination and giving her full support to him.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NP (NNP Clinton)) (, ,)
(NP (NP (DT the)
(ADJP (RBS most) (JJ successful)) (JJ female) (JJ Presidential) (NN candidate))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NNP US) (NN history))))
(, ,))
(VP (VBD ended)
(NP (PRP$ her) (JJ courageous) (NN campaign))
(PP (IN with)
(NP (DT an) (JJ emotional) (NN speech)))
(, ,)
(S (VP (VP (VBG asking)
(NP (PRP$ her) (NNS voters))
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB get)
(PP (IN behind)
(NP (NNP Obama))))
(, ,)
(VP (VBG endorsing)
(NP (PRP$ his) (NN nomination)))
(CC and)
(VP (VBG giving)
(NP (PRP$ her) (JJ full) (NN support))
(PP (TO to)
(NP (PRP him))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
I told him he needs to go back to the candidate and dig deeper into the roles and uncover the areas where the candidate has truly been successful.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (PRP I))
(VP (VBD told)
(NP (PRP him))
(SBAR (S (NP (PRP he))
(VP (VBZ needs)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VP (VB go) (ADVP (RB back)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (DT the) (NN candidate)))))
(CC and)
(VP (VB dig) (ADVP (RBR deeper))
(PP (IN into)
(NP (DT the) (NNS roles))))
(CC and)
(VP (VB uncover)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NNS areas))
(SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where))
(S (NP (DT the) (NN candidate))
(VP (AUX has) (ADVP (RB truly))
(VP (AUX been)
(ADJP (JJ successful)))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
No other Democrat received more than 6 % support of caucus goers. 30 % of the sample population from the Des Moines Register’s poll said that a candidate’s ability to bring about change in the United States was the most important to them. 27 % of the population said that a candidate who would be most successful in unifying the country would have taken priority in their votes.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (S (NP (DT No) (JJ other) (NNP Democrat))
(VP (VBD received)
(NP (QP (JJR more) (IN than) (CD 6)) (NN %))
(NP (NP (NN support))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NNP caucus) (NNS goers)))))
(. .))
(NP (NP (CD 30) (NN %))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN sample) (NN population))
(PP (IN from)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Des) (NNP Moines) (NNP Register) (POS 's)) (NN poll)))
(VP (VBD said)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (NP (DT a) (NN candidate) (POS 's)) (NN ability))
(VP (TO to)
(VP (VB bring) (PRT (RP about))
(SBAR (S (NP (NP (NN change))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (DT the) (NNP United) (NNPS States))))
(VP (AUX was)
(NP (DT the)
(ADJP (RBS most) (JJ important)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (PRP them))))
(. .))
(NP (NP (CD 27) (NN %))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN population))))
(VP (VBD said)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (NP (DT a) (NN candidate))
(SBAR (WHNP (WP who))
(S (VP (MD would)
(VP (AUX be)
(ADJP (ADJP (RBS most) (JJ successful))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (JJ unifying) (DT the) (NN country)))
(VP (MD would)
(VP (AUX have)
(VP (VBN taken)
(NP (NP (NN priority))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (PRP$ their) (NNS votes))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Mayor] Antonio Villaraigosa to [Massachusetts Gov.] Deval Patrick, non – white candidates have historically been successful reaching broader electorates when they’ve steered clear of identity politics,’ ’ said Sean Clegg, who until recently was the top political adviser to Villaraigosa.
(Parse)
(S1 (SINV (S (FRAG (NP (NP (NNP Mayor) (NN -RSB-) (NNP Antonio) (NNP Villaraigosa))
(PP (TO to)
(NP (JJ -LSB-) (NNP Massachusetts) (NNP Gov))))
(. .)
(NP (NP (JJ -RSB-) (NNP Deval) (NNP Patrick)) (, ,)
(NP (NN non))))
(: -)
(S (NP (JJ white) (NNS candidates))
(VP (AUX have) (ADVP (RB historically))
(VP (AUX been)
(ADJP (JJ successful)
(S (VP (VBG reaching)
(NP (JJR broader) (NNS electorates)))))
(SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when))
(S (NP (PRP they))
(VP (AUX 've)
(VP (VBN steered)
(ADJP (JJ clear)
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NN identity) (NNS politics)))
(, ,) ('' ') ('' ')
(VP (VBD said))
(NP (NP (NNP Sean) (NNP Clegg)) (, ,)
(SBAR (WHNP (WP who))
(S (PP (IN until) (ADVP (RB recently)))
(VP (AUX was)
(NP (NP (DT the) (JJ top) (JJ political) (NN adviser))
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NNP Villaraigosa)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
And, as at least one lawyer remarked yesterday, it clearly doesn’t help when a successful candidate for the Supreme Court bases practically his entire campaign on demonizing the role of the public defender which, like freedom of speech and religion, is guaranteed to penniless criminal defendants by the United States Constitution.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (CC And) (, ,)
(SBAR (IN as)
(S (NP (QP (IN at) (JJS least) (CD one)) (NN lawyer))
(VP (VBD remarked)
(NP (NN yesterday)))))
(, ,)
(NP (PRP it)) (ADVP (RB clearly))
(VP (AUX does) (RB n't)
(VP (VB help)
(SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when))
(S (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ successful) (NN candidate))
(PP (IN for)
(NP (DT the) (NNP Supreme) (NNP Court))))
(VP (VBZ bases)
(NP (RB practically) (PRP$ his) (JJ entire) (NN campaign))
(PP (IN on)
(S (VP (NN demonizing)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN role))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (DT the) (JJ public) (NN defender))
(SBAR (WHNP (WDT which))
(S (, ,)
(PP (IN like)
(NP (NP (NN freedom))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NN speech) (CC and) (NN religion)))))
(, ,)
(VP (AUX is)
(VP (VBN guaranteed)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (JJ penniless) (JJ criminal) (NNS defendants)))
(PP (IN by)
(NP (DT the) (NNP United) (NNP States) (NNP Constitution)))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
That same year Woods supported Colley in his bid to become leader of the party, but the other candidate, Charles Haughey, was successful.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (NP (DT That) (JJ same) (NN year))
(NP (NNP Woods))
(VP (VBD supported)
(NP (NNP Colley))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (PRP$ his) (NN bid)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB become)
(NP (NP (NN leader))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN party)))))
(, ,) (CC but)
(S (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ other) (NN candidate)) (, ,)
(NP (NNP Charles) (NNP Haughey)) (, ,))
(VP (AUX was)
(ADJP (JJ successful))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
I think that, in and of itself, is a positive for a candidate, and it is a sign that a candidate will be successful.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (PRP I))
(VP (VBP think)
(SBAR (S (S (NP (DT that)) (, ,)
(PP (IN in) (CC and) (IN of)
(NP (PRP itself)))
(, ,)
(VP (AUX is)
(NP (NP (DT a) (NN positive))
(PP (IN for)
(NP (DT a) (NN candidate)))
(, ,) (CC and)
(S (NP (PRP it))
(VP (AUX is)
(NP (DT a) (NN sign)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (DT a) (NN candidate))
(VP (MD will)
(VP (AUX be)
(ADJP (JJ successful)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Successful candidate will need to possess the ability to work on cross – functional teams and establish good working relationships within the Module Center.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (JJ Successful) (NN candidate))
(VP (MD will)
(VP (AUX need)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB possess)
(NP (DT the) (NN ability)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VP (VB work)
(PP (IN on)
(NP (NN cross)))
(: -)
(NP (JJ functional) (NNS teams)))
(CC and)
(VP (VB establish)
(NP (JJ good) (JJ working) (NNS relationships))))
(PP (IN within)
(NP (DT the) (NNP Module) (NNP Center)))))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
If the candidate is successful, (s) he then has to pass a series of graded interviews conducted at the school (conversations in the chosen foreign languages, and a general interview).
(Parse)
(S1 (S (SBAR (IN If)
(S (NP (DT the) (NN candidate))
(VP (AUX is)
(ADJP (JJ successful)))))
(, ,) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (PRP s) (-RRB- -RRB-))
(NP (PRP he)) (ADVP (RB then))
(VP (AUX has)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB pass)
(NP (NP (DT a) (NN series))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (JJ graded) (NNS interviews))
(VP (VBN conducted)
(PP (IN at)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN school)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-)
(NP (NP (NNS conversations))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (DT the) (VBN chosen) (JJ foreign) (NNS languages)) (, ,) (CC and)
(NP (DT a) (JJ general) (NN interview)))))
(-RRB- -RRB-)))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
Democratic candidates are generally most successful in the county seat and largest city, Port Angeles which casts a significant number of votes.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (JJ Democratic) (NNS candidates))
(VP (AUX are) (ADVP (RB generally))
(ADJP (ADJP (RBS most) (JJ successful))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN county) (NN seat)) (CC and)
(NP (NP (JJS largest) (NN city) (, ,) (NNP Port) (NNP Angeles))
(SBAR (WHNP (WDT which))
(S (VP (VBZ casts)
(NP (NP (DT a) (JJ significant) (NN number))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NNS votes)))
(. .)))
And 2,904 more sentences.
NB: Do not link to this page – the URL for this factoid will change every time the available knowledge base is updated.