Learned by Reading
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Perhaps most stunning is the fact that Palin’s favorable ratings are now a point higher than either man at the top of the Presidential tickets this year.
(Parse)
(S1 (SINV (ADVP (RB Perhaps))
(ADJP (RBS most) (JJ stunning))
(VP (AUX is))
(NP (DT the) (NN fact)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (NP (NNP Palin) (POS 's)) (JJ favorable) (NNS ratings))
(VP (AUX are) (ADVP (RB now))
(ADJP (ADJP (NP (DT a) (NN point)) (JJR higher))
(PP (IN than)
(NP (DT either) (NN man))))
(PP (IN at)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN top))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (DT the) (JJ Presidential) (NNS tickets))
(NP (DT this) (NN year))))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
He has a pro – life voting record and has received favorable ratings from pro – life groups such as the American Conservative Union.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (PRP He))
(VP (VP (AUX has)
(NP (DT a) (JJ pro) (: -) (NN life) (NN voting) (NN record)))
(CC and)
(VP (AUX has)
(VP (VBN received)
(NP (NP (NP (JJ favorable) (NNS ratings))
(PP (IN from)
(NP (FW pro))))
(: -)
(NP (NP (NN life) (NNS groups))
(PP (JJ such) (IN as)
(NP (DT the) (NNP American) (NNP Conservative) (NNP Union)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
The presidential and vice presidential candidates have nearly identical favorable / unfavorable ratings: Obama is at 62 % – 32 % and McCain is at 61 % – 32 %; Joe Biden is at 58 % – 27 % and Sarah Palin is at 55 % – 29 %.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (NP (DT The) (JJ presidential) (CC and) (NN vice) (JJ presidential) (NNS candidates))
(VP (AUX have)
(NP (ADJP (RB nearly) (JJ identical)) (JJ favorable) (JJ /) (JJ unfavorable) (NNS ratings))))
(: :)
(S (NP (NNP Obama))
(VP (AUX is)
(PP (IN at)
(NP (NP (CD 62) (NN %)) (: -)
(NP (CD 32) (NN %)))
(CC and)
(S (NP (NNP McCain))
(VP (AUX is)
(PP (IN at)
(NP (NP (CD 61) (NN %)) (: -)
(NP (CD 32) (NN %)) (: ;)
(S (S (NP (NNP Joe) (NNP Biden))
(VP (AUX is)
(PP (IN at)
(NP (NP (CD 58) (NN %)) (: -)
(NP (CD 27) (NN %)))
(CC and)
(S (NP (NNP Sarah) (NNP Palin))
(VP (AUX is)
(PP (IN at)
(NP (CD 55) (NN %)))
(: -)
(NP (CD 29) (NN %)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Perhaps most stunning is the fact that Palin’s favorable ratings are now a point higher than either man at the top of the Presidential tickets this year.
(Parse)
(S1 (SINV (ADVP (RB Perhaps))
(ADJP (RBS most) (JJ stunning))
(VP (AUX is))
(NP (DT the) (NN fact)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (NP (NNP Palin) (POS 's)) (JJ favorable) (NNS ratings))
(VP (AUX are) (ADVP (RB now))
(ADJP (ADJP (NP (DT a) (NN point)) (JJR higher))
(PP (IN than)
(NP (DT either) (NN man))))
(PP (IN at)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN top))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (DT the) (JJ Presidential) (NNS tickets))
(NP (DT this) (NN year))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Perhaps most stunning is the fact that Palin’s favorable ratings are now a point higher than either man at the top of the Presidential tickets this year.
(Parse)
(S1 (SINV (ADVP (RB Perhaps))
(ADJP (RBS most) (JJ stunning))
(VP (AUX is))
(NP (DT the) (NN fact)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (NP (NNP Palin) (POS 's)) (JJ favorable) (NNS ratings))
(VP (AUX are) (ADVP (RB now))
(ADJP (ADJP (NP (DT a) (NN point)) (JJR higher))
(PP (IN than)
(NP (DT either) (NN man))))
(PP (IN at)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN top))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (DT the) (JJ Presidential) (NNS tickets))
(NP (DT this) (NN year))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Biden receives favorable ratings from 51 % and unfavorable ratings from 43 %.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NNP Biden))
(VP (VBZ receives)
(NP (JJ favorable) (NNS ratings))
(PP (IN from)
(NP (NP (CD 51) (NN %)) (CC and)
(NP (JJ unfavorable) (NNS ratings))))
(PP (IN from)
(NP (CD 43) (NN %))))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
In general, NYU residence halls receive favorable ratings, and some are opulent.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (PP (IN In)
(ADJP (JJ general)))
(, ,)
(S (NP (NNP NYU) (NN residence) (NNS halls))
(VP (VBP receive)
(NP (JJ favorable) (NNS ratings))))
(, ,) (CC and)
(S (NP (DT some))
(VP (AUX are)
(ADJP (JJ opulent))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Continue here: WRAL News Poll: Easley’s favorable ratings go down
(Parse)
(S1 (FRAG (VP (VB Continue) (ADVP (RB here)))
(: :)
(NP (NNP WRAL) (NNP News) (NNP Poll)) (: :)
(S (NP (NP (NNP Easley) (POS 's)) (JJ favorable) (NNS ratings))
(VP (VBP go) (PRT (RP down))))))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Perhaps most stunning is the fact that Palin’s favorable ratings are now a point higher than either man at the top of the Presidential tickets this year.
(Parse)
(S1 (SINV (ADVP (RB Perhaps))
(ADJP (RBS most) (JJ stunning))
(VP (AUX is))
(NP (DT the) (NN fact)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (NP (NNP Palin) (POS 's)) (JJ favorable) (NNS ratings))
(VP (AUX are) (ADVP (RB now))
(ADJP (ADJP (NP (DT a) (NN point)) (JJR higher))
(PP (IN than)
(NP (DT either) (NN man))))
(PP (IN at)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN top))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (DT the) (JJ Presidential) (NNS tickets))
(NP (DT this) (NN year))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Looking cumulatively at all five red states, there’s little difference in the two candidates? net favorability rating: Palin’s favorable ratings exceed her unfavorable ratings by eighteen percentage points, and Biden’s net positive rating is 16 points.
(Parse)
(S1 (FRAG (NP (S (S (VP (VBG Looking) (ADVP (RB cumulatively))
(PP (IN at)
(NP (DT all) (CD five) (JJ red) (NNS states)))))
(, ,)
(NP (EX there))
(VP (AUX 's)
(NP (JJ little) (NN difference))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (DT the) (CD two) (NNS candidates))))
(. ?)) (JJ net) (NN favorability) (NN rating)) (: :)
(S (S (NP (NP (NNP Palin) (POS 's)) (JJ favorable) (NNS ratings))
(VP (VBP exceed)
(NP (NP (PRP$ her) (JJ unfavorable) (NNS ratings))
(PP (IN by)
(NP (CD eighteen) (NN percentage) (NNS points)))
(, ,) (CC and)
(S (NP (NP (NNP Biden) (POS 's)) (JJ net) (JJ positive) (NN rating))
(VP (AUX is)
(NP (CD 16) (NNS points)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Palin’s favorable ratings have been slowly melting, and today’s Washington Post reports that more heat is on the way.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (NP (NP (NNP Palin) (POS 's)) (JJ favorable) (NNS ratings))
(VP (VBP have)
(VP (VBN been)
(VP (ADVP (RB slowly)) (VBG melting)))))
(, ,) (CC and)
(S (NP (NP (NN today) (POS 's)) (NNP Washington) (NNP Post))
(VP (VBZ reports)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (JJR more) (NN heat))
(VP (AUX is)
(PP (IN on)
(NP (DT the) (NN way)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
As people become more aware of who Obama is and what he stands for his favorable ratings have fallen dramatically. 11 points since June.
(Parse)
(S1 (SINV (SBAR (IN As)
(S (NP (NNS people))
(VP (VBP become)
(ADJP (RBR more) (JJ aware)
(PP (IN of)
(SBAR (SBAR (WHNP (WP who))
(S (NP (NNP Obama))
(VP (AUX is))))
(CC and)
(SBAR (WHNP (WP what))
(S (NP (PRP he))
(VP (VBZ stands)
(PP (IN for)
(S (NP (PRP$ his) (JJ favorable) (NNS ratings))
(VP (AUX have)
(VP (VBN fallen) (ADVP (RB dramatically))))
(. .)))
(NP (CD 11) (NNS points))
(PP (IN since)
(NP (NNP June)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Perhaps most stunning is the fact that Palin’s favorable ratings are now a point higher than either man at the top of the Presidential tickets this year.
(Parse)
(S1 (SINV (ADVP (RB Perhaps))
(ADJP (RBS most) (JJ stunning))
(VP (AUX is))
(NP (DT the) (NN fact)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (NP (NNP Palin) (POS 's)) (JJ favorable) (NNS ratings))
(VP (AUX are) (ADVP (RB now))
(ADJP (ADJP (NP (DT a) (NN point)) (JJR higher))
(PP (IN than)
(NP (DT either) (NN man))))
(PP (IN at)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN top))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (DT the) (JJ Presidential) (NNS tickets))
(NP (DT this) (NN year))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
The Obama campaign just released a new YouTube video to recruit volunteers in Michigan, a left – leaning swing state where McCain retains very high favorable ratings.
(Parse)
(S1 (FRAG (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Obama) (NN campaign)) (ADVP (RB just))
(VP (VBN released)
(NP (DT a) (JJ new) (NNP YouTube) (NN video))
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (NN recruit)
(NP (NNS volunteers))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NNP Michigan)))
(, ,)
(NP (DT a) (JJ left))))
(: -)
(NP (NP (VBG leaning) (NN swing) (NN state))
(SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where))
(S (NP (NNP McCain))
(VP (VBZ retains)
(NP (ADJP (RB very) (JJ high)) (JJ favorable) (NNS ratings)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
It may also explain why her poll numbers have started to slip, as in a Fox News poll last week that showed her favorable ratings dipping to 47 % from 54 %.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (PRP It))
(VP (MD may) (ADVP (RB also))
(VP (VB explain)
(SBAR (WHADVP (WRB why))
(S (NP (PRP$ her) (JJ poll) (NNS numbers))
(VP (VBP have)
(VP (VBN started)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB slip))))
(, ,)
(PP (IN as)
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (DT a) (NNP Fox) (NNP News) (NN poll))
(NP (JJ last) (NN week))
(SBAR (WHNP (WDT that))
(S (VP (VBD showed)
(S (NP (PRP$ her) (JJ favorable) (NNS ratings))
(VP (VBG dipping)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (CD 47) (NN %)))
(PP (IN from)
(NP (CD 54) (NN %)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Gov. Sarah Palin’s favorable / unfavorable ratings have suffered a stunning 21 point collapse in just one week, according to Research 2000 polling.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NP (NNP Gov) (. .) (NNP Sarah) (NNP Palin) (POS 's)) (JJ favorable) (JJ /) (JJ unfavorable) (NNS ratings))
(VP (AUX have)
(VP (VBN suffered)
(NP (DT a) (JJ stunning) (CD 21) (NN point) (NN collapse))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (QP (RB just) (CD one)) (NN week)))
(, ,)
(PP (VBG according)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NNP Research) (CD 2000) (NN polling)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Looking cumulatively at all five red states, there’s little difference in the two candidates? net favorability rating: Palin’s favorable ratings exceed her unfavorable ratings by eighteen percentage points, and Biden’s net positive rating is 16 points.
(Parse)
(S1 (FRAG (NP (S (S (VP (VBG Looking) (ADVP (RB cumulatively))
(PP (IN at)
(NP (DT all) (CD five) (JJ red) (NNS states)))))
(, ,)
(NP (EX there))
(VP (AUX 's)
(NP (JJ little) (NN difference))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (DT the) (CD two) (NNS candidates))))
(. ?)) (JJ net) (NN favorability) (NN rating)) (: :)
(S (S (NP (NP (NNP Palin) (POS 's)) (JJ favorable) (NNS ratings))
(VP (VBP exceed)
(NP (NP (PRP$ her) (JJ unfavorable) (NNS ratings))
(PP (IN by)
(NP (CD eighteen) (NN percentage) (NNS points)))
(, ,) (CC and)
(S (NP (NP (NNP Biden) (POS 's)) (JJ net) (JJ positive) (NN rating))
(VP (AUX is)
(NP (CD 16) (NNS points)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Looking cumulatively at all five red states, there’s little difference in the two candidates’ net favorability rating: Palin’s favorable ratings exceed her unfavorable ratings by eighteen percentage points, and Biden’s net positive rating is 16 points.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (S (VP (VBG Looking) (ADVP (RB cumulatively))
(PP (IN at)
(NP (DT all) (CD five) (JJ red) (NNS states)))))
(, ,)
(NP (EX there))
(VP (AUX 's)
(NP (JJ little) (NN difference))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (DT the) (CD two) (NNS candidates) (POS ')) (JJ net) (NN favorability) (NN rating)))))
(: :)
(S (NP (NP (NNP Palin) (POS 's)) (JJ favorable) (NNS ratings))
(VP (VBP exceed)
(NP (NP (PRP$ her) (JJ unfavorable) (NNS ratings))
(PP (IN by)
(NP (CD eighteen) (NN percentage) (NNS points)))
(, ,) (CC and)
(S (NP (NP (NNP Biden) (POS 's)) (JJ net) (JJ positive) (NN rating))
(VP (AUX is)
(NP (CD 16) (NNS points))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
“Palin’s favorable ratings have been slowly melting, and today’s Washington Post reports that more heat is on the way.
(Parse)
(S1 (PRN ('' ') ('' ')
(S (S (NP (NP (NNP Palin) (POS 's)) (JJ favorable) (NNS ratings))
(VP (VBP have)
(VP (VBN been)
(VP (ADVP (RB slowly)) (VBG melting)))))
(, ,) (CC and)
(S (NP (NP (NN today) (POS 's)) (NNP Washington) (NNP Post))
(VP (VBZ reports)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (JJR more) (NN heat))
(VP (AUX is)
(PP (IN on)
(NP (DT the) (NN way)))))
(. .))))
And 235 more sentences.