Learned by Reading
In Wikipedia:
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be more sensitive than CT after several days.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NP (JJ Magnetic) (NN resonance) (NN imaging)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-)
(NP (NNP MRI)) (-RRB- -RRB-)))
(VP (MD may)
(VP (AUX be)
(ADJP (ADJP (RBR more) (JJ sensitive))
(SBAR (IN than)
(S (VP (VBN CT)
(PP (IN after)
(NP (JJ several) (NNS days)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
INTRODUCTION The Bible attributes to God the capacity to know the thoughts of men. [1] Most scientists are unaware that thought reading by electroencephalogram (EEG) was reported as feasible in work begun over 30 years ago, [2] which more recently a number of groups confirm by EEG, Magnetoencephalograpy (MEG), and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) technologies.
(Parse)
(S1 (FRAG (NP (NP (NP (NN INTRODUCTION))
(SBAR (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Bible))
(VP (VBZ attributes)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NNP God)))
(S (NP (DT the) (NN capacity))
(VP (TO to)
(VP (VB know)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NNS thoughts))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NNS men)))
(. .)))
(JJ -LSB-) (CD 1))
(S (NP (JJ -RSB-) (NNP Most) (NNS scientists))
(VP (AUX are)
(ADJP (JJ unaware)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (VP (VBD thought)
(SBAR (S (S (VP (VBG reading)
(PP (IN by)
(NP (NP (NN electroencephalogram)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-)
(NP (NNP EEG)) (-RRB- -RRB-)))
(VP (AUX was)
(VP (VBN reported)
(PP (IN as)
(NP (ADJP (JJ feasible)
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (NP (NN work))
(VP (VBN begun) (PRT (RP over)) (ADVP (NP (CD 30) (NNS years)) (RB ago))))
(, ,)
(NP (NP (JJ -LSB-) (CD 2) (NN -RSB-))
(SBAR (WHNP (WDT which))
(S (ADVP (RBR more) (RB recently))
(NP (NP (DT a) (NN number))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NNS groups))))
(VP (VBP confirm)
(PP (IN by)
(NP (NP (NNP EEG)) (, ,)
(NP (NP (NNP Magnetoencephalograpy)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-)
(NP (NNP MEG)) (-RRB- -RRB-)))
(, ,))))
(CC and)
(NP (JJ functional) (JJ Magnetic) (NN Resonance) (NN Imaging)))))
(PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (FW fMRI) (-RRB- -RRB-)) (NNS technologies))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
METHODS: To clarify how experimental functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) design affects stimulus – induced brain activity, we compared brief event – related presentation of erotic vs. neutral stimuli with blocked presentation in 10 male volunteers.
(Parse)
(S1 (NP (NP (NNS METHODS)) (: :)
(S (VP (TO To)
(VP (VB clarify)
(SBAR (WHADVP (WRB how))
(S (NP (NP (NP (JJ experimental) (JJ functional) (JJ magnetic) (NN resonance) (NN imaging)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NN fMRI) (-RRB- -RRB-)))
(NN design))
(VP (VBZ affects)
(NP (NP (NN stimulus)) (: -)
(S (NP (VBN induced) (NN brain) (NN activity)) (, ,)
(NP (PRP we))
(VP (VBD compared)
(NP (NP (JJ brief) (NN event)) (: -)
(NP (NP (JJ related) (NN presentation))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (JJ erotic) (NNP vs))))
(. .)
(NP (JJ neutral) (NNS stimuli)))
(PP (IN with)
(NP (NP (VBN blocked) (NN presentation))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (CD 10) (JJ male) (NNS volunteers)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we found that these coactive regions form a functionally connected cognitive control network (CCN).
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (VP (VBG Using)
(NP (JJ functional) (JJ magnetic) (NN resonance) (NN imaging)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (FW fMRI) (-RRB- -RRB-))))
(, ,)
(NP (PRP we))
(VP (VBD found)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (DT these) (JJ coactive) (NNS regions))
(VP (VBP form)
(NP (NP (DT a)
(ADJP (RB functionally) (JJ connected)) (JJ cognitive) (NN control) (NN network)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-)
(NP (NNP CCN)) (-RRB- -RRB-))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Physicians would now be able to accurately detect Alzheimer’s disease at an earlier stage – thanks to an automated system for measuring brain tissue with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a new study has revealed.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (NP (NNS Physicians))
(VP (MD would) (ADVP (RB now))
(VP (AUX be)
(ADJP (JJ able)
(S (VP (TO to) (ADVP (RB accurately))
(VP (VB detect)
(NP (NP (NNP Alzheimer) (POS 's)) (NN disease))
(PP (IN at)
(NP (NP (DT an) (JJR earlier) (NN stage)) (: -)
(NP (NP (NNS thanks))
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NP (DT an) (JJ automated) (NN system))
(PP (IN for)
(S (VP (VBG measuring)
(NP (NN brain) (NN tissue))
(PP (IN with)
(NP (NP (JJ magnetic) (NN resonance) (NN imaging)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-)
(NP (NNP MRI)) (-RRB- -RRB-))))
(, ,)
(NP (DT a) (JJ new) (NN study))
(VP (AUX has)
(VP (VBN revealed)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Similarly, recent human functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) revealed widespread, spontaneously emerging cortical fluctuations.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (ADVP (RB Similarly)) (, ,)
(NP (NP (JJ recent) (JJ human) (JJ functional) (JJ magnetic) (NN resonance) (NN imaging)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NN fMRI) (-RRB- -RRB-)))
(VP (VBD revealed)
(ADJP (JJ widespread)) (, ,)
(S (ADVP (RB spontaneously))
(VP (VBG emerging)
(NP (JJ cortical) (NNS fluctuations)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol. 16, No. 5 – 6.
(Parse)
(S1 (NP (NP (NP (JJ Magnetic) (NN Resonance) (NN Imaging)) (, ,)
(NP (NNP Vol.) (CD 16) (, ,)
(NP (NNP No.) (CD 5))))
(: -)
(NP (CD 6)) (. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Detailed pathological tests need to be conducted along with X – rays of the chest, abdomen and lungs and Computed Topography scans (CT scans) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (JJ Detailed) (JJ pathological) (NNS tests))
(VP (AUX need)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (AUX be)
(VP (VP (VBN conducted) (PRT (RP along))
(PP (IN with)
(NP (NNP X)))
(: -)
(NP (NP (NNS rays))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN chest) (, ,) (NNS abdomen) (CC and) (NNS lungs)))))
(CC and)
(VP (VBN Computed)
(NP (NP (NN Topography) (NNS scans)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-)
(NP (NNP CT) (NNS scans)) (-RRB- -RRB-)) (CC and)
(NP (NP (JJ Magnetic) (NN Resonance) (NN Imaging)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-)
(NP (NNP MRI)) (-RRB- -RRB-))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Non contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging MRI.
(Parse)
(S1 (FRAG (NP (NN Non) (NN contrast))
(NP (NP (JJ enhanced) (JJ magnetic) (NN resonance) (NN imaging))
(NP (NNP MRI)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
The information provided by the MEG is entirely different from that provided by computed tomography (CT), topographic encephalography, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)? imaging instruments that provide still, structural, and anatomical information.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN information))
(VP (VBN provided)
(PP (IN by)
(NP (DT the) (NNP MEG)))))
(VP (AUX is)
(ADJP (RB entirely) (JJ different)
(PP (IN from)
(NP (NP (DT that))
(VP (VBN provided)
(PP (IN by)
(NP (NP (JJ computed) (NN tomography)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NN CT) (-RRB- -RRB-)) (, ,)
(NP (JJ topographic) (NN encephalography)) (, ,) (CC or)
(NP (NP (JJ magnetic) (NN resonance) (NN imaging)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-)
(NP (NNP MRI)) (-RRB- -RRB-)) (. ?)
(NP (NN imaging) (NNS instruments))
(SBAR (WHNP (WDT that))
(S (VP (VBP provide)
(NP (ADJP (RB still) (, ,) (JJ structural) (, ,) (CC and) (JJ anatomical)) (NN information))))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
It uses Functional magnetic resonance imaging to look at the activity in the pre frontal cortex to determine the truthfulness of statements, functional magnetic resonance imaging results can be questioned, however, seeing as the test relies on anxiety level.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (PRP It))
(VP (VBZ uses)
(NP (JJ Functional) (JJ magnetic) (NN resonance) (NN imaging))
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB look)
(PP (IN at)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN activity))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (DT the) (JJ pre) (JJ frontal) (NN cortex))
(SBAR (S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB determine)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN truthfulness))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (NNS statements)) (, ,)
(SBAR (S (NP (JJ functional) (JJ magnetic) (NN resonance) (NN imaging) (NNS results))
(VP (MD can)
(VP (AUX be)
(VP (VBN questioned) (, ,) (ADVP (RB however)) (, ,)
(S (VP (VBG seeing)
(SBAR (IN as)
(S (NP (DT the) (NN test))
(VP (VBZ relies)
(PP (IN on)
(NP (NN anxiety) (NN level))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Recent research, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs), has demonstrated that no matter how much a normal functioning spine is compressed or twisted, there is ample room in the space between the vertebrae for free movement of the nerve.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NP (JJ Recent) (NN research)) (, ,)
(VP (VBG using)
(NP (NP (JJ magnetic) (NN resonance) (NN imaging)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-)
(NP (NNP MRIs)) (-RRB- -RRB-))))
(, ,))
(VP (AUX has)
(VP (VBN demonstrated)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (ADVP (DT no) (NN matter)
(SBAR (WHADJP (WRB how) (JJ much))
(S (NP (DT a) (JJ normal) (NN functioning) (NN spine))
(VP (AUX is)
(VP (VBN compressed) (CC or) (VBN twisted)))
(, ,)
(NP (EX there))
(VP (AUX is)
(NP (NP (JJ ample) (NN room))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN space))
(PP (IN between)
(NP (DT the) (NNS vertebrae)))
(PP (IN for)
(NP (NP (JJ free) (NN movement))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN nerve))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
PurposeThe objective of this study was to assess changes in the water apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and in pharmacokinetic parameters obtained from the fast – exchange regime (FXR) modeling of dynamic contrast – enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE – MRI) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Materials and MethodsEleven patients with locally advanced breast cancer underwent MRI examination prior to and after chemotherapy but prior to surgery.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NP (NNP PurposeThe) (NN objective))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT this) (NN study))))
(VP (VP (AUX was)
(S (VP (TO to)
(VP (VB assess)
(NP (NP (NNS changes))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (DT the) (NN water) (JJ apparent) (NN diffusion) (NN coefficient)))
(PRN (-LRB- -LRB-)
(NP (NNP ADC)) (-RRB- -RRB-))))
(CC and)
(VP (PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (NP (JJ pharmacokinetic) (NNS parameters))
(VP (VBN obtained)
(PP (IN from)
(NP (DT the) (JJ fast) (: -) (NN exchange) (NN regime) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-)
(NP (NNP FXR)) (-RRB- -RRB-)) (NN modeling))))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (JJ dynamic) (NN contrast))))
(: -)
(NP (NP (NP (JJ enhanced) (JJ magnetic) (NN resonance) (NN imaging)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-)
(NP (NNP DCE)) (: -)
(NP (NNP MRI)) (-RRB- -RRB-)))
(PP (IN during)
(NP (NP (NN neoadjuvant) (NN chemotherapy))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NN breast) (NN cancer)))
(. .)
(NP (NNP Materials) (CC and) (NNP MethodsEleven) (NNS patients))
(PP (IN with)
(NP (ADJP (RB locally) (JJ advanced)) (NN breast) (NN cancer)))))
(VBD underwent)
(NP (NNP MRI) (NN examination)) (ADVP (RB prior)
(PP (TO to) (CC and) (IN after)
(NP (NN chemotherapy)) (CC but) (RB prior)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NN surgery))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Although the method is illustrated by application to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of a packed bed of uniform spheres, the algorithm is entirely general and may be applied to any fully sampled three – dimensional image or reconstructed porous medium.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (SBAR (IN Although)
(S (NP (DT the) (NN method))
(VP (AUX is)
(VP (VBN illustrated)
(PP (IN by)
(NP (NP (NN application))
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NP (JJ magnetic) (NN resonance) (NN imaging)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-)
(NP (NNP MRI)) (-RRB- -RRB-))
(NP (NP (NNS data))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT a) (VBN packed) (NN bed)))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (JJ uniform) (NNS spheres)))
(, ,)
(NP (DT the) (NN algorithm))
(VP (VP (AUX is)
(ADJP (RB entirely) (JJ general)))
(CC and)
(VP (MD may)
(VP (AUX be)
(VP (VBN applied)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NP (DT any)
(ADJP (RB fully) (VBN sampled)) (CD three)) (: -)
(NP (JJ dimensional) (NN image) (CC or) (JJ reconstructed) (JJ porous) (NN medium)))))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed abnormal signal intensity, comprising iso – signal intensity on T1 – and high – signal intensity on T2 – weighted images surrounding the flexor tendons in the forearm.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NP (JJ Magnetic) (NN resonance) (NN imaging)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-)
(NP (NNP MRI)) (-RRB- -RRB-)))
(VP (VBD showed)
(NP (JJ abnormal) (NN signal) (NN intensity)) (, ,)
(PP (VBG comprising)
(NP (NP (NN iso)) (: -)
(NP (NP (NN signal) (NN intensity))
(PP (IN on)
(NP (NP (ADJP (JJ T1) (: -) (CC and) (JJ high) (: -)) (NN signal) (NN intensity))
(PP (IN on)
(NP (NNP T2)))
(: -)
(NP (NP (JJ weighted) (NNS images))
(VP (VBG surrounding)
(NP (NP (DT the) (JJ flexor) (NNS tendons))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (DT the) (NN forearm)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
Background: It is generally believed that activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is restricted to gray matter.
(Parse)
(S1 (NP (NP (NN Background)) (: :)
(S (NP (PRP It))
(VP (AUX is) (ADVP (RB generally))
(VP (VBN believed)
(SBAR (IN that)
(S (NP (NP (NN activation))
(PP (IN in)
(NP (NP (JJ functional) (JJ magnetic) (NN resonance) (NN imaging)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NN fMRI) (-RRB- -RRB-)))))
(VP (AUX is)
(VP (VBN restricted)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (JJ gray) (NN matter))))
(. .)))
In the British National Corpus:
The pathogenesis, diagnosis, natural history, and treatment of the disease is discussed briefly with emphasis on the importance of early diagnosis – preferably by magnetic resonance imaging.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN pathogenesis) (, ,) (NN diagnosis) (, ,) (JJ natural) (NN history) (, ,) (CC and) (NN treatment))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (DT the) (NN disease))))
(VP (AUX is)
(VP (VBN discussed) (ADVP (RB briefly))
(PP (IN with)
(NP (NN emphasis)))
(PP (IN on)
(NP (NP (DT the) (NN importance))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (JJ early) (NN diagnosis)) (: --) (ADVP (RB preferably)))
(PP (IN by)
(NP (JJ magnetic) (NN resonance) (NN imaging)))))
(. .)))
In Wikipedia:
Theoretically guided by perspectives from cognitive psychology and evolutionary biology, Rachel uses psychophysical, self – report, cognitive – behavioral and neurological techniques, including functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), to investigate these topics.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (S (ADVP (RB Theoretically))
(VP (VBN guided)
(PP (IN by)
(NP (NP (NNS perspectives))
(PP (IN from)
(NP (NP (JJ cognitive) (NN psychology)) (CC and)
(NP (JJ evolutionary) (NN biology)))))
(, ,)
(NP (NNP Rachel))
(VP (VBZ uses)
(NP (NP (NN psychophysical) (, ,) (NN self)) (: -)
(NP (NN report) (, ,) (NN cognitive)) (: -))
(S (NP (NP (JJ behavioral) (CC and) (JJ neurological) (NNS techniques)) (, ,)
(PP (VBG including)
(NP (NP (JJ functional) (JJ magnetic) (NN resonance) (NN imaging)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-)
(NP (NN fMRI)) (-RRB- -RRB-))))
(, ,))
(VP (TO to)
(VP (VB investigate)
(NP (DT these) (NNS topics)))
(. .)))
In the ICWSM 2009 Weblog Corpus:
The relative hydrolytic stability of contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), consisting of paramagnetic metal chelates bound to polysaccharides through an ester bond, has been investigated.
(Parse)
(S1 (S (NP (NP (DT The) (JJ relative) (JJ hydrolytic) (NN stability))
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (NN contrast) (NNS agents))
(PP (IN for)
(NP (NP (JJ magnetic) (NN resonance) (NN imaging)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-)
(NP (NNP MRI)) (-RRB- -RRB-)))
(, ,)
(VP (VBG consisting)
(PP (IN of)
(NP (NP (JJ paramagnetic) (NN metal) (NNS chelates))
(VP (VBN bound)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (NNS polysaccharides)))
(PP (IN through)
(NP (DT an) (NNP ester) (NN bond))))
(, ,))
(VP (AUX has)
(VP (AUX been)
(VP (VBN investigated))))
(. .)))
And 1,883 more sentences.