Chen

For comps

1. a higher expectation: passing all exams at the same time would test a student at a much higher level than the requirements in individual courses
2. bootcamp experience: 1st year students working together forming lasting friendship
3. collective faculty attention to students: faculty working together creating and grading exams and discussing results
4. survival training: to succeed in grad school and later career, one must learn to perform under pressure
5. competitive advantage: comps can work in small departments but not large ones


Against comps

1. time sink: for the first year
2. no research:
3. material not most relevant: esp. for students in some areas
4. process not working: a student stays in the programs regardless of the test results
5. resentment by some students

James

Joel

Pro:

1. Our only uniform measure and comparison

2. Encourage attention and hard work in associated courses

3. Encourage really learning some fundamentals, so that they might have a serious chance of ``cross pollination''

4. Stark discovery of outliers on the low end

5. Test our impressions of specialization prospects

Con:

1. Exceedingly busy time of year, thus discouraging well thought-out Comps questions, course final exams, and serious faculty attention to thesis proposals and six-month reviews

2. All-year pressure on students

3. Distraction from research, by both students and faculty

4. Some depressing performances (actually a pro, if we take constructive action!)

5. Ill will with the students (and applicants!)

Daphane

Nick

Satiyaki

Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r3 < r2 < r1 | Backlinks | Raw View | Raw edit | More topic actions...
Topic revision: r2 - 2010-05-23 - JoelSeiferas
 
  • Edit
  • Attach
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright © 2008-2017 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding URCS? Send feedback