- ...Approach
- Support for this
work was provided by NSF grant IRI-9306454, ONR grant
N00014-93-I-0221, Sverige-Amerika Stiftelsen and the Fulbright
Commission
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...Jägersand
- Also Chalmers, 412 96 Göteborg, Sweden
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...ranges
- This is not true of
most natural scenes [5].
In fact a scale study of the fractal dimension of an image has been used to
determine whether it contains man-made objects.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...image.
-
What we consider to be the underlying
event for our distribution is really not that important. One way of
thinking of
p(x) is as the distribution
function for the probability that a light quantum hits position x given
exactly one light quantum hitting some position in the image.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...them
- Note that the x-axis is reversed to show resolution
lengths, as in the information distribution plots, rather than spatial
frequency.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.