exert.01
frames- One could argue that it *EXP*-1 is not an assertion of a item veto at all for [ARG0 the president] , by *-2 [rel exerting] [ARG1 a power of excision] , to resist unconstitutional conditions in legislation that *T*-3 violate the separation of powers .
- So we must look elsewhere for an explanation of [ARG1 the unusual power] 0 [ARG0 this case] has [rel exerted] *T*-1 over [ARG2-over the minds of many , not just in Washington but elsewhere in the country and even the world] .
- [ARGM-MOD Will] [ARG0 national service , in the current highly politicized and opportunistic form] [rel exert] [ARG1 enough appeal * to get adopted *-1] ?